These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35119402)

  • 1. Attractive Versus Golden Ratios: Formula of Utopian Beauty through Comparison of Facial Proportions among Worldwide Celebrities and Average People.
    Yalcinkaya E; Kocaman SA; Yuksekkaya M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1950-1955. PubMed ID: 35119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Ideal Dimensions of the Ears, Nose, and Lip in the Circles of Prominence Theory on Facial Beauty.
    Young P
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2019 May; 21(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 30763411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of Hairline and Forehead Sexual Dimorphic Aesthetics in 60 Celebrities Using Artificial Intelligence.
    Salinas CA; Liu A; Sharaf BA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Jul; 11(7):e5107. PubMed ID: 37427151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal facial analysis of female celebrity attractiveness standards through artificial intelligence.
    Grillo R; Quinta Reis BA; Lima BC; Peral Ferreira Pinto LA; Melhem-Elias F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):722-726. PubMed ID: 38580557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Esthetic Difference of Chinese Beauty Evaluated by Two Different Human Races Based on Three-Dimensional Average Face Analysis.
    Chen C; Chen Y; Li Q; Kau CH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 31299738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New "golden" ratios for facial beauty.
    Pallett PM; Link S; Lee K
    Vision Res; 2010 Jan; 50(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 19896961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Matoula S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of face proportions on face attractiveness.
    Przylipiak M; Przylipiak J; Terlikowski R; Lubowicka E; Chrostek L; Przylipiak A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):954-959. PubMed ID: 30291673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Is the Most Beautiful Facial Proportion in the 21st Century? Comparative Study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, Neoclassical Canons, and Facial Golden Ratios.
    Burusapat C; Lekdaeng P
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e2044. PubMed ID: 30881823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it possible to define the ideal lips?
    Kar M; Muluk NB; Bafaqeeh SA; Cingi C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Feb; 38(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 29756617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial Morphometrics in Black Celebrities: Contemporary Facial Analysis Using an Artificial Intelligence Platform.
    Salinas CA; Liu A; Sharaf BA
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jul; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive Italian women.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):282-93. PubMed ID: 18030374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Variation in the assessment of facial aesthetics of women during the past 150 years].
    Kuitert RB; Aydin B
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2020 Dec; 127(12):683-689. PubMed ID: 33367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness.
    Popenko NA; Tripathi PB; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Osann K; Wong BJF
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 19(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28208179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face and their correlation to phi among Indians in Moradabad population: A survey.
    Anand S; Tripathi S; Chopra A; Khaneja K; Agarwal S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 26929498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities.
    Liu AS; Salinas CA; Sharaf BA
    Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad046. PubMed ID: 37441561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Do the Faces of Kyrgyz Beauties Look? A Photogrammetric Analysis of Beauty Pageant Winners.
    Hwang SW; Wu X; Tukeshov SK; Hwang K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):1587-1589. PubMed ID: 37253143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.