BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3511952)

  • 1. A statistical examination of the accuracy of combining femoral length and biparietal diameter as an index of fetal gestational age.
    Yagel S; Adoni A; Oman S; Wax Y; Hochner-Celnikier D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 93(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 3511952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
    L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of biparietal diameter and femur length in the third trimester: effects of gestational age and variation in fetal growth.
    Wolfson RN; Peisner DB; Chik LL; Sokol RJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Mar; 5(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 3517362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating fetal age by ultrasound measurements: an example of multivariate calibration.
    Oman SD; Wax Y
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):947-60. PubMed ID: 6398713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is fetal femur length a better indicator of gestational age in the growth-retarded fetus as compared with biparietal diameter?
    Woo JS; Wan CW; Fang A; Au KL; Tang LC; Ghosh A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Mar; 4(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 3884834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the fetal femur length and biparietal diameter in predicting gestational age in the third trimester.
    Tse CH; Lee KW
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Aug; 24(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 6596082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the femur length to estimate fetal weight in premature infants: preliminary results.
    Campbell WA; Vintzileos AM; Neckles S; Weinbaum PJ; Nochimson DJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Nov; 4(11):583-90. PubMed ID: 3908705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea.
    Amoa AB; Wapi J; Klufio CA
    P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of biparietal diameter as an accurate indicator of gestational age.
    Kurtz AB; Wapner RJ; Kurtz RJ; Dershaw DD; Rubin CS; Cole-Beuglet C; Goldberg BB
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1980 Aug; 8(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 6772680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of ultrasound fetometry in estimating gestational age in the second trimester.
    Persson PH; Weldner BM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 3535363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL).
    Hsieh FJ; Chang FM; Huang HC; Lu CC; Ko TM; Chen HY
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 86(9):957-64. PubMed ID: 3320270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serial biparietal diameter and femur length measurements in twin gestations.
    Gilstrap LC; Hankins GD; Collins TL; Pierson W
    Am J Perinatol; 1986 Jul; 3(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 3718638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of gestational age and maternal height on fetal femur length calculations.
    Pierce BT; Hancock EG; Kovac CM; Napolitano PG; Hume RF; Calhoun BC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 1):742-6. PubMed ID: 11339927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length.
    Woo JS; Wan CW; Cho KM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Feb; 4(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 3882988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of gestational age by ultrasonic measurement of the femur length.
    Shalev E; Feldman E; Weiner E; Zuckerman H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 3883692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fifth digit measurement in normal pregnancies: a potential sonographic sign of Down's syndrome.
    Goldstein I; Gomez K; Copel JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 5(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 7850587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum fetal weight estimation: a comparison of three formulae.
    Yarkoni S; Reece EA; Wan M; Holford T; Romero R; Hobbins JC
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Dec; 5(12):707-10. PubMed ID: 3543391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.