These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35120458)

  • 1. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling.
    Onifade M; Roy-Gagnon MH; Parent MÉ; Burkett KM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 35120458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models.
    Chen H; Wang C; Conomos MP; Stilp AM; Li Z; Sofer T; Szpiro AA; Chen W; Brehm JM; Celedón JC; Redline S; Papanicolaou GJ; Thornton TA; Laurie CC; Rice K; Lin X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Apr; 98(4):653-66. PubMed ID: 27018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CERAMIC: Case-Control Association Testing in Samples with Related Individuals, Based on Retrospective Mixed Model Analysis with Adjustment for Covariates.
    Zhong S; Jiang D; McPeek MS
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006329. PubMed ID: 27695091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods to account for relatedness in genome-wide association studies with family-based data.
    Eu-Ahsunthornwattana J; Miller EN; Fakiola M; ; Jeronimo SM; Blackwell JM; Cordell HJ
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jul; 10(7):e1004445. PubMed ID: 25033443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Cautionary Note on the Effects of Population Stratification Under an Extreme Phenotype Sampling Design.
    Panarella M; Burkett KM
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():398. PubMed ID: 31130982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. JASPER: Fast, powerful, multitrait association testing in structured samples gives insight on pleiotropy in gene expression.
    Mbatchou J; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Aug; 111(8):1750-1769. PubMed ID: 39025064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating SNP heritability in presence of population substructure in biobank-scale datasets.
    Lin Z; Seal S; Basu S
    Genetics; 2022 Apr; 220(4):. PubMed ID: 35106569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies.
    Zhou W; Nielsen JB; Fritsche LG; Dey R; Gabrielsen ME; Wolford BN; LeFaive J; VandeHaar P; Gagliano SA; Gifford A; Bastarache LA; Wei WQ; Denny JC; Lin M; Hveem K; Kang HM; Abecasis GR; Willer CJ; Lee S
    Nat Genet; 2018 Sep; 50(9):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 30104761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generalized functional linear models for gene-based case-control association studies.
    Fan R; Wang Y; Mills JL; Carter TC; Lobach I; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE; Weeks DE; Xiong M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 38(7):622-637. PubMed ID: 25203683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective Binary-Trait Association Test Elucidates Genetic Architecture of Crohn Disease.
    Jiang D; Zhong S; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Feb; 98(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 26833331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel association test for multiple secondary phenotypes from a case-control GWAS.
    Ray D; Basu S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):413-426. PubMed ID: 28393390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principal component regression and linear mixed model in association analysis of structured samples: competitors or complements?
    Zhang Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25536929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjustment for covariates using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies.
    Wang T; Xue X; Xie X; Ye K; Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 42(8):812-825. PubMed ID: 30238496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the impact of relatedness on SNP association analysis.
    Gross A; Tönjes A; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2017 Dec; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 29212447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of population structure informative principal components for adjustment in a case-control study.
    Peloso GM; Lunetta KL
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jul; 12():64. PubMed ID: 21771328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rare-Variant Kernel Machine Test for Longitudinal Data from Population and Family Samples.
    Yan Q; Weeks DE; Tiwari HK; Yi N; Zhang K; Gao G; Lin WY; Lou XY; Chen W; Liu N
    Hum Hered; 2015; 80(3):126-38. PubMed ID: 27161037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidance for the utility of linear models in meta-analysis of genetic association studies of binary phenotypes.
    Cook JP; Mahajan A; Morris AP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27848946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.