These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35120525)
1. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis. Zheng Z; Sun J; Jiang L; Wu Y; He J; Ruan W; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 35120525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis. AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. Zhu J; Rong Q; Wang X; Gao X J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):646-655. PubMed ID: 27881319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of different CAD/CAM materials on internal and marginal adaptations and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations with: 3D finite element analysis. El-Farag SAA; Elerian FA; Elsherbiny AA; Abbas MH BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37357307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis. Abtahi S; Alikhasi M; Siadat H J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):600.e1-600.e8. PubMed ID: 35016795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of endocrowns: 3D finite element analysis. He J; Zheng Z; Wu M; Zheng C; Zeng Y; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):495. PubMed ID: 34610825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns]. Jiang YS; Feng L; Gao XJ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Aug; 53(4):764-769. PubMed ID: 34393242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Madruga CFL; Valera MC; Borges ALS; Bresciani E; de Melo RM Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 29935769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses. Shams A; Elsherbini M; Elsherbiny AA; Özcan M; Sakrana AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105031. PubMed ID: 34922296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of margin designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a finite element analysis. Zeng B; Luo B; Hu J; Meng D; Zhang J; Cao X; Jiang Q BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):657. PubMed ID: 38840138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. Zheng Z; He Y; Ruan W; Ling Z; Zheng C; Gai Y; Yan W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 32471627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different endocrown designs: Finite element study. Aldesoki M; Bourauel C; Morsi T; El-Anwar MI; Aboelfadl AK; Elshazly TM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105309. PubMed ID: 35689987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of fiber insertion and different material type on stress distribution in endocrown restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Yildirim G; Demir C; Güven MÇ; Koç O; Dalkiliç EE Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Oct; 25(13):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 34964689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. Taha D; Spintzyk S; Schille C; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T; Geis-Gerstorfer J J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):293-297. PubMed ID: 29241944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials. Tribst JPM; Lo Giudice R; Dos Santos AFC; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Amaral M; Lo Giudice G Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 33803194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]