204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35121090)
61. Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Femur Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Mechas CA; Isla AE; Abbenhaus EJ; Landy DC; Duncan ST; Selby JB; Aneja A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 May; 37(5):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 35093546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Clinical outcomes of osteosynthesis of well-fixed periprosthetic proximal tibial fractures (Felix type 2A) after total knee arthroplasty.
Sim JA; Shon OJ; Joo YB; Sohn HS; Byun SE; Kim JW
Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):3099-3103. PubMed ID: 34253352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Buttaro MA; Farfalli G; Paredes Núñez M; Comba F; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1964-9. PubMed ID: 17768193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: our institutional experience.
Kinov P; Volpin G; Sevi R; Tanchev PP; Antonov B; Hakim G
Injury; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1945-50. PubMed ID: 26115579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Percutaneous cerclage wiring and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO): a percutaneous reduction technique in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures.
Apivatthakakul T; Phornphutkul C; Bunmaprasert T; Sananpanich K; Fernandez Dell'Oca A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Jun; 132(6):813-22. PubMed ID: 22389063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Novel classification system for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a consideration for comminution.
Laubach LK; Sharma V; Krumme JW; Larkin K; Satpathy J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Aug; 33(6):2541-2546. PubMed ID: 36635567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Results and complications in the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with a locked plate system].
Pressmar J; Macholz F; Merkert W; Gebhard F; Liener UC
Unfallchirurg; 2010 Mar; 113(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 19629421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Clinical outcomes of locked plating of distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort.
Hoffmann MF; Jones CB; Sietsema DL; Tornetta P; Koenig SJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 8():43. PubMed ID: 24279475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Early peri-implant fractures after distal femur fracture locked plating?
Meyer AP; Large TM
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Jul; 33(5):2081-2089. PubMed ID: 36201033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Boesmueller S; Baumbach SF; Hofbauer M; Wozasek GE
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2015 Oct; 127(19-20):770-8. PubMed ID: 26187336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Re-fractures after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A difficult to treat growing evidence.
Randelli F; Pace F; Priano D; Giai Via A; Randelli P
Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S43-S47. PubMed ID: 30415668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Operative Results of Periprosthetic Fractures of The Distal Femur In A Single Academic Unit.
Leino OK; Lempainen L; Virolainen P; Sarimo J; Pölönen T; Mäkelä KT
Scand J Surg; 2015 Sep; 104(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 25332221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Locking plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with and without cerclage wires.
Ebraheim NA; Sochacki KR; Liu X; Hirschfeld AG; Liu J
Orthop Surg; 2013 Aug; 5(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 24002835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Cable plate fixation for Vancouver Type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures-Our experience and identification of a subset at risk of non-union.
Chakrabarti D; Thokur N; Ajnin S
Injury; 2019 Dec; 50(12):2301-2305. PubMed ID: 31630783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures.
Rodriguez EK; Boulton C; Weaver MJ; Herder LM; Morgan JH; Chacko AT; Appleton PT; Zurakowski D; Vrahas MS
Injury; 2014 Mar; 45(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 24275357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Minimally invasive double-plating osteosynthesis of the distal femur.
Beeres FJP; Emmink BL; Lanter K; Link BC; Babst R
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Dec; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 32548732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Orthogonal plating of Vancouver B1 and C-type periprosthetic femur fracture nonunions.
Birch CE; Blankstein M; Chlebeck JD; Bartlett Rd CS
Hip Int; 2017 Nov; 27(6):578-583. PubMed ID: 28574123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Outcomes of fixation for periprosthetic tibia fractures around and below total knee arthroplasty.
Morwood MP; Gebhart SS; Zamith N; Mir HR
Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):978-982. PubMed ID: 30929804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Finite element analysis of the stability of retrograde intramedullary nail and plate-screw combinations for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee replacement.
Kurtuluş B; Bulut E
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2024 Apr; 28(8):3165-3175. PubMed ID: 38708475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision.
Cohen S; Flecher X; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 29458200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
