These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3512196)

  • 1. Cytopress: automated slide preparation of cytologic material from suspension.
    Oud PS; Haag DJ; Zahniser DJ; Ramaekers FC; Huysmans AC; Veldhuizen JA; Verheyen RH; Verrijp K; Broers JL; Herman CJ
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 3512196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated deposition of cellular material on glass slides: Cytopress.
    Oud PS; Haag DJ; Hermkens HG; Zahniser DJ; Herman CJ; Vooijs GP
    Acta Histochem Suppl; 1986; 32():209-14. PubMed ID: 2422686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical analysis of cell populations in smear and monolayer preparations from the uterine cervix. I. The proportions of isolated, abnormal epithelial cells in slides from one applicator.
    Neugebauer D; Otto K; Soost HJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 7258858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Components and results of a new preparation technique for automated analysis of cervical samples.
    Otto K; Höffken H; Soost HJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1979; 1(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 543574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method of producing a monolayer of cervical cells for digital image processing.
    Rosenthal DL; Stern E; McLatchie C; Wu A; Lagasse LD; Wall R; Castleman KR
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1979; 1(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 396838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative comparison of slide and suspension technique for acridine orange staining of human cells.
    Wheeless LL; Patten SF; Onderdonk MA
    Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 4129939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A protocol for Papanicolaou staining of cytologic specimens following flow analysis.
    Berkan TK; Reeder JE; Lopez PA; Gorman KM; Wheeless LL
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 2419052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of filtration on the loss of abnormal cervical cells in specimen preparation for automated cytology.
    Rosenthal DL; Leibel J; Meyer DJ; Woods SD; McLatchie C; Suffin SC; Castleman KR
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Dec; 5(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 6670791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
    Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated slide preparation system for the clinical laboratory.
    Zahniser DJ; Hurley AA
    Cytometry; 1996 Mar; 26(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 8809482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure-fixation method of transferring cells from polycarbonate filters to glass slides.
    Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Garcia GL; van Boekel MC; Haag DJ; Hermkens HG; Pahlplatz MM; Vooijs PG; Herman CJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Jun; 6(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 6380364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fundamental study of automatic cytoscreening for uterine cancer. IV. Sample requirements for CYBEST and simulation test of cell dispersion.
    Tanaka N; Ikeda H; Ueno T; Watanabe S; Imasato Y; Tsunekawa S
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 333840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
    Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of fixation and preparation on the AgNOR distribution in routinely processed breast cancer specimens.
    Biesterfeld S; Ruoss E; Hufnagl P; Martin H
    Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Mar; 140(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 7515672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of a cervical smear preparation procedure from the BioPEPR image analysis system.
    Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Harbers-Hendriks R; van Boekel MC; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Mar; 3(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7015946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Determination of a significant cell count for positive diagnosis in gynecologic suspension preparations and possible consequences for the analysis of automated preparations].
    Schwarz G; Schwarz M
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():21-7. PubMed ID: 6353174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automation of blood film preparation and staining utilizing the technicon autoslide.
    Pierre RV
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 6156731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new type of two-color fluorescence staining for cytology specimens.
    Cornelisse CJ; Ploem JS
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1976 Jan; 24(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 56393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proliferation patterns of cervical cells as visualized in Leiden liquid cytology slides.
    Luzzatto L; van Haaften C; Boon ME
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jul; 31(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15236256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated cytology. A symposium by correspondence. VII. Sorting or marking the prescreened cells.
    Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(5):422-43. PubMed ID: 4106829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.