250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35122126)
1. Evaluation of simulation models in neurosurgical training according to face, content, and construct validity: a systematic review.
Chawla S; Devi S; Calvachi P; Gormley WB; Rueda-Esteban R
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Apr; 164(4):947-966. PubMed ID: 35122126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel System of Simulation Models for Aneurysm Clipping Training: Description of Models and Assessment of Face, Content, and Construct Validity.
Belykh E; Giovani A; Abramov I; Ngo B; Bardonova L; Zhao X; Loymak T; Mooney MA; Sheehy JP; McBryan S; Tanikawa R; Lawton MT; Preul MC
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2021 Nov; 21(6):558-569. PubMed ID: 34662910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects.
Weinstock P; Rehder R; Prabhu SP; Forbes PW; Roussin CJ; Cohen AR
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28438070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of an Aneurysm Clipping Model Using Human Placenta.
Belykh E; Miller EJ; Lei T; Chapple K; Byvaltsev VA; Spetzler RF; Nakaji P; Preul MC
World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():952-960.e2. PubMed ID: 28647655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning brain aneurysm microsurgical skills in a human placenta model: predictive validity.
de Oliveira MMR; Ferrarez CE; Ramos TM; Malheiros JA; Nicolato A; Machado CJ; Ferreira MT; de Oliveira FB; de Sousa CFPM; Costa PHV; Gusmao S; Lanzino G; Maestro RD
J Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 128(3):846-852. PubMed ID: 28338438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel VR/AR surgical simulator of a minimally invasive spine operation.
Alkadri S; Del Maestro RF; Driscoll M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Jun; 62(6):1887-1897. PubMed ID: 38403863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity.
Shamim Khan M; Ahmed K; Gavazzi A; Gohil R; Thomas L; Poulsen J; Ahmed M; Jaye P; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):518-23. PubMed ID: 22928639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Face, Content, and Construct Validity Evaluation of Simulation Models in General Surgery Laparoscopic Training and Education: A Systematic Review.
Rueda Esteban RJ; López-McCormick JS; Rodríguez-Bermeo AS; Andrade M; Hernández Restrepo JD; Targarona Soler EM
Surg Innov; 2023 Apr; 30(2):251-260. PubMed ID: 36062557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox.
Ahmed R; Muirhead W; Williams SC; Bagchi B; Datta P; Gupta P; Salvadores Fernandez C; Funnell JP; Hanrahan JG; Davids JD; Grover P; Tiwari MK; Murphy M; Marcus HJ
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1185516. PubMed ID: 37325417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing performance in brain tumor resection using a novel virtual reality simulator.
Gélinas-Phaneuf N; Choudhury N; Al-Habib AR; Cabral A; Nadeau E; Mora V; Pazos V; Debergue P; DiRaddo R; Del Maestro RF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23784222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual Reality vs Phantom Model: Benefits and Drawbacks of Simulation Training in Neurosurgery.
Amini A; Allgaier M; Saalfeld S; Stein KP; Rashidi A; Swiatek VM; Sandalcioglu IE; Neyazi B
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38847530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.
Costello DM; Huntington I; Burke G; Farrugia B; O'Connor AJ; Costello AJ; Thomas BC; Dundee P; Ghazi A; Corcoran N
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):749-763. PubMed ID: 34480323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review.
Ahmed K; Jawad M; Abboudi M; Gavazzi A; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Vale J; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 21571338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.
Thinggaard E
Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.
Hung AJ; Shah SH; Dalag L; Shin D; Gill IS
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 25801765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construct and face validity of the educational computer-based environment (ECE) assessment scenarios for basic endoneurosurgery skills.
Cagiltay NE; Ozcelik E; Sengul G; Berker M
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4485-4495. PubMed ID: 28389794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Cadaveric Simulation in Neurosurgical Training: A Review of the Literature.
Gnanakumar S; Kostusiak M; Budohoski KP; Barone D; Pizzuti V; Kirollos R; Santarius T; Trivedi R
World Neurosurg; 2018 Oct; 118():88-96. PubMed ID: 30017763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Khan R; Plahouras J; Johnston BC; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Walsh CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD008237. PubMed ID: 30117156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Sirimanna P; Gladman MA
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.
Moglia A; Ferrari V; Morelli L; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 26433570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
