These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35122295)

  • 21. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mental Health Among Black and Latinx Sexual Minority Adults Leading Up to and Following the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Results from a Natural Experiment.
    Krueger EA; Westmoreland DA; Choi SK; Harper GW; Lightfoot M; Hammack PL; Meyer IH
    LGBT Health; 2021 Oct; 8(7):454-462. PubMed ID: 34410196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992).
    McCann SJ
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):741-2. PubMed ID: 11508013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.
    Westen D; Blagov PS; Harenski K; Kilts C; Hamann S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1947-58. PubMed ID: 17069484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes from What People Watch.
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2017 Mar; 5(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 28328251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An interaction effect of norm violations on causal judgment.
    Gill M; Kominsky JF; Icard TF; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105183. PubMed ID: 35830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Latino early adolescents' psychological and physiological responses during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Zeiders KH; Nair RL; Hoyt LT; Pace TWW; Cruze A
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2020 Apr; 26(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 31436441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
    Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Role of Mesolimbic Circuitry in Buffering Election-Related Distress.
    Tashjian SM; Galván A
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(11):2887-2898. PubMed ID: 29431648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.
    Baccini L; Brodeur A; Weymouth S
    J Popul Econ; 2021; 34(2):739-767. PubMed ID: 33469244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cultural effects on the association between election outcomes and face-based trait inferences.
    Lin C; Adolphs R; Alvarez RM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180837. PubMed ID: 28700647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.
    Langenhoff AF; Wiegmann A; Halpern JY; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Sep; 129():101412. PubMed ID: 34303092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple method for predicting American presidential greatness from victory margin in popular vote (1824-1996).
    McCann SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 145(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 15960001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.