162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35122582)
1. In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: a cross-sectional analysis of an international survey.
Vitale SG; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Riemma G; De Franciscis P; Alonso Pacheco L; Carugno J
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 35122582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.
Verma U; Astudillo-Dávalos FE; Gerkowicz SA
Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25708503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in pregnancy.
Sanders AP; Sanders B
Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1408-1409. PubMed ID: 30503139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system compared to copper intrauterine device: a population-based cohort study.
Bosco-Lévy P; Gouverneur A; Langlade C; Miremont G; Pariente A
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):345-349. PubMed ID: 30871933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 24 patients with IUD-related problems: hysteroscopic findings.
Tadesse E; Wamsteker K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1985 Jan; 19(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 3979653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Roke CM
Contraception; 1988 Jun; 37(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 3396356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection compared with Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on postmenstrual spotting in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar: A prospective cohort study.
He X; Yan L; He C; Zhu C; Mol BW; Zhang J; Huirne JAF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():66-73. PubMed ID: 34461384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The suture fixation of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device using the hysteroscopic cold-knife surgery system: an original method in treatment of adenomyosis.
Zhu L; Yang X; Cao B; Tang S; Tong J
Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1191-1193. PubMed ID: 34238576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic sterilization in patients with a Mirena intrauterine device: transition from extended interval to permanent contraception.
Tatalovich JM; Anderson TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 20226413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae.
Pabuccu R; Onalan G; Kaya C; Selam B; Ceyhan T; Ornek T; Kuzudisli E
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1973-7. PubMed ID: 18774563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of the LNG IUD when strings are not visible: a case series.
Swenson C; Royer PA; Turok DK; Jacobson JC; Amaral G; Sanders JN
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 24835830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The role of copper-releasing intrauterine device or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on uterine bleeding and iron status (prospective study of 8 years)].
Imperato F; Perniola G; Mossa B; Marziani R; Perniola F; Stragapede B; Napolitano C
Minerva Ginecol; 2002 Jun; 54(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 12063443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment.
Kaislasuo J; Suhonen S; Gissler M; Lähteenmäki P; Heikinheimo O
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1546-51. PubMed ID: 23526304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
