149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35122685)
1. CORR Insights®: In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Parks ML
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1102-1103. PubMed ID: 35122685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-mobility constructs versus large femoral head bearings in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Hoskins W; McDonald L; Claireaux H; Bingham R; Griffin X
Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):685-696. PubMed ID: 35438011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No Difference in Dislocation Rates Comparing Large Diameter Jumbo Femoral Heads and Dual-Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Sonn KA; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3716-3721. PubMed ID: 34391597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Stoney J; Graves SE; Bingham R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Aug; 104(16):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 35703140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of dual-mobility cup in primary total hip arthroplasties: an Italian regional register (RIPO) study on three thousand, seven hundred and ten cases.
Tigani D; Castiello E; Moghnie A; Bruschi A; Serra M; Amendola L; Bordini B
Int Orthop; 2023 Jan; 47(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36449052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hatton A; Peng Y; Graves S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard, Large-Head, Dual-Mobility, or Constrained-Liner Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for a Diagnosis of Dislocation: An Analysis of 1,275 Revision Total Hip Replacements.
Hoskins W; Bingham R; Hatton A; de Steiger RN
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Dec; 102(23):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 33264216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Pitz-Gonçalves LI; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S124-S130. PubMed ID: 36791889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Weintraub MT; DeBenedetti A; Nam D; Darrith B; Baker CM; Waren D; Schwarzkopf R; Courtney PM; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S206-S210. PubMed ID: 37019309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.
Farey JE; Masters J; Cuthbert AR; Iversen P; van Steenbergen LN; Prentice HA; Adie S; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR; Paxton EW; Costa ML; Overgaard S; Rogmark C; Rolfson O; Harris IA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1912-1925. PubMed ID: 35767813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
van Steenbergen LN; de Reus IM; Hannink G; Vehmeijer SB; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
