274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35123040)
1. Surgical Science-Simbionix Robotic Hysterectomy Simulator: Validating a New Tool.
Cope AG; Lazaro-Weiss JJ; Willborg BE; Lindstrom ED; Mara KC; Destephano CC; Vetter MH; Glaser GE; Langstraat CL; Chen AH; Martino MA; Dinh TA; Salani R; Green IC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 35123040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Myomectomy.
Schneyer RJ; Scheib SA; Green IC; Molina AL; Mara KC; Wright KN; Siedhoff MT; Truong MD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):330-340.e1. PubMed ID: 38307222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?
Mills JT; Hougen HY; Bitner D; Krupski TL; Schenkman NS
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1052-1056. PubMed ID: 28623113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual Reality Simulation Has Weak Correlation with Overall Trainee Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performance.
Berges AJ; Vedula SS; Malpani A; Chen CCG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 34896658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Transoral Robotic Surgery Simulator Utilizing Artificial Tissue.
Murr AT; Lumley CJ; Feins RH; Hackman TG
Laryngoscope; 2022 Aug; 132(8):1588-1593. PubMed ID: 34882806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum.
Volpe A; Ahmed K; Dasgupta P; Ficarra V; Novara G; van der Poel H; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25454612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator.
Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Randomized Comparison of 2 Robotic Virtual Reality Simulators and Evaluation of Trainees' Skills Transfer to a Simulated Robotic Urethrovesical Anastomosis Task.
Hoogenes J; Wong N; Al-Harbi B; Kim KS; Vij S; Bolognone E; Quantz M; Guo Y; Shayegan B; Matsumoto ED
Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():110-115. PubMed ID: 29054720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for robotic pyeloplasty simulation training.
Timberlake MD; Garbens A; Schlomer BJ; Kavoussi NL; Kern AJM; Peters CA; Gahan JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Jun; 16(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 32173325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Setting Benchmarks for the New User: Training on the Robotic Simulator.
Dioun SM; Fleming ND; Munsell MF; Lee J; Ramirez PT; Soliman PT
JSLS; 2017; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 29279661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.
Hovgaard LH; Andersen SAW; Konge L; Dalsgaard T; Larsen CR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 29603003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device.
Foell K; Furse A; Honey RJ; Pace KT; Lee JY
J Robot Surg; 2013 Dec; 7(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 27001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS).
Frederick PJ; Szender JB; Hussein AA; Kesterson JP; Shelton JA; Anderson TL; Barnabei VM; Guru K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 27780777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis.
Tanaka A; Graddy C; Simpson K; Perez M; Truong M; Smith R
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3720-9. PubMed ID: 26581619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training.
Azadi S; Green IC; Arnold A; Truong M; Potts J; Martino MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):490-495. PubMed ID: 33310145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
