These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35123049)

  • 1. Intraoperative stitched fluoroscopic images: effect of parallax on angular measurements of the spine.
    Ellingson AM; Boelter K; Sembrano JN; Takahashi T; Polly DW
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1012-1015. PubMed ID: 35123049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography.
    Hasegawa K; Okamoto M; Hatsushikano S; Caseiro G; Watanabe K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):437. PubMed ID: 30522465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw postion.
    Santos ER; Ledonio CG; Castro CA; Truong WH; Sembrano JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E119-25. PubMed ID: 21673628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New generation intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (O-arm) in 100 spine surgeries: does it change the surgical procedure?
    Sembrano JN; Santos ER; Polly DW
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 21(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 24120710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment.
    Vaynrub M; Hirsch BP; Tishelman J; Vasquez-Montes D; Buckland AJ; Errico TJ; Protopsaltis TS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Aug; 29(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 29775162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-Dose Radiation 3D Intraoperative Imaging: How Low Can We Go? An O-Arm, CT Scan, Cadaveric Study.
    Sarwahi V; Payares M; Wendolowski S; Maguire K; Thornhill B; Lo Y; Amaral TD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(22):E1311-E1317. PubMed ID: 28296816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-length tomosynthesis and 3D-2D registration for intraoperative assessment of spine instrumentation.
    Zhang X; Uneri A; Wu P; Ketcha MD; Jones CK; Huang Y; Lo SL; Helm PA; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):055008. PubMed ID: 33477120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw placement with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image guidance navigation.
    Kim TT; Drazin D; Shweikeh F; Pashman R; Johnson JP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Mar; 36(3):E1. PubMed ID: 24580001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of a free-standing lead-shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure during intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging.
    Guenthner G; Eddy A; Sembrano J; Polly DW; Martin CT
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 32445800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spinal intraoperative three-dimensional navigation: correlation between clinical and absolute engineering accuracy.
    Guha D; Jakubovic R; Gupta S; Alotaibi NM; Cadotte D; da Costa LB; George R; Heyn C; Howard P; Kapadia A; Klostranec JM; Phan N; Tan G; Mainprize TG; Yee A; Yang VX
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 27777052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?
    Wylie JD; Ferrer MG; McClincy MP; Miller PE; Millis MB; Kim YJ; Novais EN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 30676406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
    Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and Usefulness of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging by Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector.
    Fujimori T; Iwasaki M; Nagamoto Y; Kashii M; Takao M; Sugiura T; Yoshikawa H
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Feb; 30(1):E64-E75. PubMed ID: 28107246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure during spinal instrumentation using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation.
    Mendelsohn D; Strelzow J; Dea N; Ford NL; Batke J; Pennington A; Yang K; Ailon T; Boyd M; Dvorak M; Kwon B; Paquette S; Fisher C; Street J
    Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 26686604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of EOS Imaging Technology in Comparison to Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Vertebral Rotational Orientation in Instrumented Spines in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Jiang F; Simões L; Ouellet J; Saran N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(2):E87-E94. PubMed ID: 33038195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine - an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study.
    Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():20. PubMed ID: 31069046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation.
    Tabaraee E; Gibson AG; Karahalios DG; Potts EA; Mobasser JP; Burch S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23883830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative measures of modic changes in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: intra- and inter-rater reliability.
    Wang Y; Videman T; Niemeläinen R; Battié MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1236-43. PubMed ID: 21217445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.