128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35123235)
1. Recent advances in microbial community analysis from machine learning of multiparametric flow cytometry data.
Özel Duygan BD; van der Meer JR
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2022 Jun; 75():102688. PubMed ID: 35123235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing Biodegradability of Chemical Compounds from Microbial Community Growth Using Flow Cytometry.
Özel Duygan BD; Rey S; Leocata S; Baroux L; Seyfried M; van der Meer JR
mSystems; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33563780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PhenoGMM: Gaussian Mixture Modeling of Cytometry Data Quantifies Changes in Microbial Community Structure.
Rubbens P; Props R; Kerckhof FM; Boon N; Waegeman W
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33536320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying cell densities and biovolumes of phytoplankton communities and functional groups using scanning flow cytometry, machine learning and unsupervised clustering.
Thomas MK; Fontana S; Reyes M; Pomati F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196225. PubMed ID: 29746500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid detection of microbiota cell type diversity using machine-learned classification of flow cytometry data.
Özel Duygan BD; Hadadi N; Babu AF; Seyfried M; van der Meer JR
Commun Biol; 2020 Jul; 3(1):379. PubMed ID: 32669688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. flowSim: Near duplicate detection for flow cytometry data.
Montante S; Chen Y; Brinkman RR
Cytometry A; 2023 Nov; 103(11):889-901. PubMed ID: 37530476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of microbial disturbances in a drinking water microbial community through continuous acquisition and advanced analysis of flow cytometry data.
Props R; Rubbens P; Besmer M; Buysschaert B; Sigrist J; Weilenmann H; Waegeman W; Boon N; Hammes F
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():73-82. PubMed ID: 30121434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. flowEMMi: an automated model-based clustering tool for microbial cytometric data.
Ludwig J; Zu Siederdissen CH; Liu Z; Stadler PF; Müller S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):643. PubMed ID: 31815609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying keystone species in microbial communities using deep learning.
Wang XW; Sun Z; Jia H; Michel-Mata S; Angulo MT; Dai L; He X; Weiss ST; Liu YY
Nat Ecol Evol; 2024 Jan; 8(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 37974003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An open-source solution for advanced imaging flow cytometry data analysis using machine learning.
Hennig H; Rees P; Blasi T; Kamentsky L; Hung J; Dao D; Carpenter AE; Filby A
Methods; 2017 Jan; 112():201-210. PubMed ID: 27594698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel high-throughput multi-parameter flow cytometry based method for monitoring and rapid characterization of microbiome dynamics in anaerobic systems.
Dhoble AS; Bekal S; Dolatowski W; Yanz C; Lambert KN; Bhalerao KD
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():566-571. PubMed ID: 27614579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalized microbiome dynamics - Cytometric fingerprints for routine diagnostics.
Koch C; Müller S
Mol Aspects Med; 2018 Feb; 59():123-134. PubMed ID: 28669592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow Cytometric Single-Cell Identification of Populations in Synthetic Bacterial Communities.
Rubbens P; Props R; Boon N; Waegeman W
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169754. PubMed ID: 28122063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the Presence and Abundance of Bacterial Taxa in Environmental Communities through Flow Cytometric Fingerprinting.
Heyse J; Schattenberg F; Rubbens P; Müller S; Waegeman W; Boon N; Props R
mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0055121. PubMed ID: 34546074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometry: principles, applications and recent advances.
Manohar SM; Shah P; Nair A
Bioanalysis; 2021 Feb; 13(3):181-198. PubMed ID: 33543666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Flow Cytometric MRD Assessment in Childhood Acute B- Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using Supervised Machine Learning.
Reiter M; Diem M; Schumich A; Maurer-Granofszky M; Karawajew L; Rossi JG; Ratei R; Groeneveld-Krentz S; Sajaroff EO; Suhendra S; Kampel M; Dworzak MN;
Cytometry A; 2019 Sep; 95(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 31282025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards Quantitative Microbiome Community Profiling Using Internal Standards.
Lin Y; Gifford S; Ducklow H; Schofield O; Cassar N
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 85(5):. PubMed ID: 30552195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of flow cytometry for rapid, high-throughput, multiparametric analysis of environmental microbiomes.
Priyadarsini M; Kushwaha J; Pandey KP; Rani J; Dhoble AS
J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Nov; 214():106841. PubMed ID: 37832922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning methods for microbiome studies.
Namkung J
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):206-216. PubMed ID: 32108316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
