128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35123235)
21. The relevance of flow cytometry for biochemical analysis.
O'Connor JE; Callaghan RC; Escudero M; Herrera G; Martínez A; Monteiro MD; Montolíu H
IUBMB Life; 2001 Apr; 51(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11569917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biogeographic Patterns in Members of Globally Distributed and Dominant Taxa Found in Port Microbial Communities.
Ghannam RB; Schaerer LG; Butler TM; Techtmann SM
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31996419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methods for discovery and characterization of cell subsets in high dimensional mass cytometry data.
Diggins KE; Ferrell PB; Irish JM
Methods; 2015 Jul; 82():55-63. PubMed ID: 25979346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics - Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities.
Lambrecht J; Schattenberg F; Harms H; Mueller S
J Vis Exp; 2018 Jul; (137):. PubMed ID: 30059034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Compositionality, sparsity, spurious heterogeneity, and other data-driven challenges for machine learning algorithms within plant microbiome studies.
Busato S; Gordon M; Chaudhari M; Jensen I; Akyol T; Andersen S; Williams C
Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2023 Feb; 71():102326. PubMed ID: 36538837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine Learning Predicts Biogeochemistry from Microbial Community Structure in a Complex Model System.
Dutta A; Goldman T; Keating J; Burke E; Williamson N; Dirmeier R; Bowman JS
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0190921. PubMed ID: 35138192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Machine learning predicts ecological risks of nanoparticles to soil microbial communities.
Xu N; Kang J; Ye Y; Zhang Q; Ke M; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Lu T; Peijnenburg WJGM; Josep Penuelas ; Bao G; Qian H
Environ Pollut; 2022 Aug; 307():119528. PubMed ID: 35623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Learning Single-Cell Distances from Cytometry Data.
Nguyen B; Rubbens P; Kerckhof FM; Boon N; De Baets B; Waegeman W
Cytometry A; 2019 Jul; 95(7):782-791. PubMed ID: 31099963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metabolome of human gut microbiome is predictive of host dysbiosis.
Larsen PE; Dai Y
Gigascience; 2015; 4():42. PubMed ID: 26380076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Machine learning predicts the impact of antibiotic properties on the composition and functioning of bacterial community in aquatic habitats.
Kang J; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Zhou Z; Zhang J; Xu N; Zhang Q; Lu T; Peijnenburg WJGM; Qian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 828():154412. PubMed ID: 35276139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of Machine Learning for Cytometry Data.
Hu Z; Bhattacharya S; Butte AJ
Front Immunol; 2021; 12():787574. PubMed ID: 35046945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Viability of amoebae, fungal conidia, and yeasts: rapid assessment by flow cytometry.
Noble-Wang JA; Zhang S; Price D; Ahearn DG
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 268():153-61. PubMed ID: 15156027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advances in Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling toward Microbial Community Analysis of the Human Microbiome.
Esvap E; Ulgen KO
ACS Synth Biol; 2021 Sep; 10(9):2121-2137. PubMed ID: 34402617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Taxonomic and Functional Dysregulation in Salivary Microbiomes During Oral Carcinogenesis.
Chen JW; Wu JH; Chiang WF; Chen YL; Wu WS; Wu LW
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2021; 11():663068. PubMed ID: 34604102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine learning analysis of microbial flow cytometry data from nanoparticles, antibiotics and carbon sources perturbed anaerobic microbiomes.
Dhoble AS; Lahiri P; Bhalerao KD
J Biol Eng; 2018; 12():19. PubMed ID: 30220912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Meta-analysis of 16S rRNA Microbial Data Identified Distinctive and Predictive Microbiota Dysbiosis in Colorectal Carcinoma Adjacent Tissue.
Mo Z; Huang P; Yang C; Xiao S; Zhang G; Ling F; Li L
mSystems; 2020 Apr; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 32291348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EXPERT: transfer learning-enabled context-aware microbial community classification.
Chong H; Zha Y; Yu Q; Cheng M; Xiong G; Wang N; Huang X; Huang S; Sun C; Wu S; Chen WH; Coelho LP; Ning K
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Nov; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36124759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.
Ryan FJ
Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 31420049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load.
Vandeputte D; Kathagen G; D'hoe K; Vieira-Silva S; Valles-Colomer M; Sabino J; Wang J; Tito RY; De Commer L; Darzi Y; Vermeire S; Falony G; Raes J
Nature; 2017 Nov; 551(7681):507-511. PubMed ID: 29143816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Randomized Lasso Links Microbial Taxa with Aquatic Functional Groups Inferred from Flow Cytometry.
Rubbens P; Schmidt ML; Props R; Biddanda BA; Boon N; Waegeman W; Denef VJ
mSystems; 2019 Sep; 4(5):. PubMed ID: 31506260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
