These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35124072)

  • 1. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chalhoub JM; Hawa F; Grantham T; Lester J; Carpenter ES; Mendoza-Ladd A; Wani S; Machicado JD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Oct; 100(4):595-604.e8. PubMed ID: 38852683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
    Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Needles and Methods of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy to Optimize Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy for Patients With Pancreatic Masses in a Randomized Trial.
    Young Bang J; Krall K; Jhala N; Singh C; Tejani M; Arnoletti JP; Navaneethan U; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Apr; 19(4):825-835.e7. PubMed ID: 32652307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    van Riet PA; Erler NS; Bruno MJ; Cahen DL
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 32583392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Han S; Bhullar F; Alaber O; Kamal A; Hopson P; Kanthasamy K; Coughlin S; Archibugi L; Thiruvengadam N; Moreau C; Jin D; Paragomi P; Valverde-López F; Nagpal S; Yazici C; Papchristou G; Lee PJ; Akshintala V;
    Endosc Int Open; 2021 Jun; 9(6):E853-E862. PubMed ID: 34079867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the diagnostic adequacy of 25-Gauge fork-tip
    Haig A; John AS; Vaska K; Banh X; Huelsen A
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2024; 13(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 38947121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.