These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35124189)

  • 1. Studies of diagnostic test accuracy: Partial verification bias and test result-based sampling.
    Kohn MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 May; 145():179-182. PubMed ID: 35124189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.
    Arifin WN; Yusof UK
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1709-1727. PubMed ID: 35043447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
    Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
    Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias.
    Ma X; Chen Y; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):3015-3037. PubMed ID: 24862512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Bates AS; Margolis PA; Evans AT
    J Pediatr; 1993 Apr; 122(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8463905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic accuracy measures when comparing multiple screening tests - an application to the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.
    Day E; Eldred-Evans D; Prevost AT; Ahmed HU; Fiorentino F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):70. PubMed ID: 35300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the direction of bias in studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Kohn MA; Carpenter CR; Newman TB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1194-206. PubMed ID: 24238322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
    Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests.
    He H; McDermott MP
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jan; 13(1):32-47. PubMed ID: 21856650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic countries.
    Agarwal R; Choi L; Johnson S; Takwoingi Y
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 11(11):CD013218. PubMed ID: 33146932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
    Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biases in diagnostic test studies: impact on estimating sensitivity and specificity].
    Rendón-Macías ME; Valenzuela M; Villasís-Keever MÁ
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 32892530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
    Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R
    Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
    de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.