These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35124459)

  • 1. Left ventricular strain derived from computed tomography feature tracking: Determinants of failure and reproducibility.
    Chen J; Zhang LY; Liu Y; Wang YF; Zhou CS; Lu GM; Zhang LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 148():110190. PubMed ID: 35124459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of temporal resolution on computed tomography feature-tracking strain measurements.
    Chen J; Tang M; Wang JQ; Chen C; Zhou Y; Lu GM; Zhang LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110644. PubMed ID: 36525702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.
    Morton G; Schuster A; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 22721175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Wang J; Li W; Sun J; Liu H; Kang Y; Yang D; Yu L; Greiser A; Zhou X; Han Y; Chen Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):404-414. PubMed ID: 29283466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR.
    Wang R; Fang Z; Wang H; Schoepf UJ; Emrich T; Giovagnoli D; Biles E; Zhou Z; Du Z; Liu T; Xu L
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109485. PubMed ID: 33401113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of Biventricular Myocardial Strain Using CMR Feature Tracking: Reproducibility in Small Animals.
    Li H; Qu Y; Metze P; Sommerfeld F; Just S; Abaei A; Rasche V
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8492705. PubMed ID: 33553431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking.
    Liu J; Li Y; Cui Y; Cao Y; Yao S; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Zeng W; Shi H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Sep; 20(1):400. PubMed ID: 32883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility and reproducibility of feature-tracking-based strain and strain rate measures of the left ventricle in different diseases and genders.
    Maceira AM; Tuset-Sanchis L; López-Garrido M; San Andres M; López-Lereu MP; Monmeneu JV; García-González MP; Higueras L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1415-1425. PubMed ID: 29205626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking.
    Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of the left ventricular three-dimensional maximum principal strain using cardiac computed tomography: reference values from subjects with normal cardiac function.
    Yoshida K; Tanabe Y; Kido T; Kurata A; Uraoka D; Kinoshita M; Uetani T; Nishimura K; Inoue K; Ikeda S; Yamaguchi O; Mochizuki T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6109-6117. PubMed ID: 32556462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of regional and global longitudinal strains derived from two-dimensional speckle-tracking and doppler tissue imaging between expert and novice readers during quantitative dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Yamada A; Luis SA; Sathianathan D; Khandheria BK; Cafaro J; Hamilton-Craig CR; Platts DG; Haseler L; Burstow D; Chan J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Aug; 27(8):880-7. PubMed ID: 24891261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and Comparison of Quantitative Right Ventricular Strain Assessment by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pulmonary Hypertension Using Feature Tracking and Deformable Registration Algorithms.
    Song J; Chen Y; Cui Y; Kong X; Liu J; Cao Y; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Shi H
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):e306-e313. PubMed ID: 32624401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Kawakubo M; Nagao M; Kikuchi N; Yamamoto A; Nakao R; Matsuo Y; Kaneko K; Watanabe E; Sasaki M; Nunoda S; Sakai S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jan; 36(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 34643890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of global and segmental myocardial strain using cine DENSE at 3 T: a multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in healthy subjects and patients with heart disease.
    Auger DA; Ghadimi S; Cai X; Reagan CE; Sun C; Abdi M; Cao JJ; Cheng JY; Ngai N; Scott AD; Ferreira PF; Oshinski JN; Emamifar N; Ennis DB; Loecher M; Liu ZQ; Croisille P; Viallon M; Bilchick KC; Epstein FH
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Apr; 24(1):23. PubMed ID: 35369885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.