126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35124635)
1. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. USE OF CLINICAL EXPOSURE INDEX AND DEVIATION INDEX BASED ON NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL AS DOSE-OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR GENERAL RADIOGRAPHY IN KOREA.
Park H; Yoon Y; Kim J; Kim J; Jeong H; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 33201240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
Seeram E
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?
Guðjónsdóttir J; Paalsson KE; Sveinsdóttir GP
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):903-907. PubMed ID: 33707050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From the use of exposure index in quality control testing to the use of exposure index for quality control of clinical images.
Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; AlNaemi H; Kharita MH
Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100454. PubMed ID: 36386764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of new patient dose management tool in digital radiography: Using clinical exposure index data of mobile chest radiography in a large university hospital.
Park H; Kim J; Kang EJ; Kim Y; Jo H; Heo JH; Yang W; Yoon Y
Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20760. PubMed ID: 37860502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.
Zhang M; Chu C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 21725621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
