These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35124635)

  • 21. Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.
    İnal T; Ataç G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.
    Seibert JA; Morin RL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21491197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
    Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].
    Ariga E
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1433-7. PubMed ID: 22104235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of Entrance Surface Dose in Chest Radiography Using Clinical Images: Estimation of Subject Thickness Using Two-direction Radiography].
    Ichikawa T; Ono K; Asada Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(7):661-666. PubMed ID: 30033959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
    van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retrospective patient dose analysis of Ghana's first direct digital radiography system.
    Inkoom S; Togobo J; Emi-Reynolds G; Oddoye A; Ntiri TO; Gyekye PK
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22739831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
    Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proposed diagnostic reference levels for general radiography and mammography in Japan.
    Asada Y; Kondo Y; Kobayashi M; Kobayashi K; Ichikawa T; Matsunaga Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):867-876. PubMed ID: 32590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Propose for the Benchmark Dose (BD) for the Optimization of Protection in Medical Exposure in General Radiography].
    Watanabe H; Seki M; Nitta M; Serita I; Maehara Y; Okura H; Murakami T; Yamamoto K; Sato T; Tajima R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 29780043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Roch P; Célier D; Dessaud C; Etard C; Rehani MM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 31529257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical note: Four-year experience with utilization of DICOM metadata analytics in clinical digital radiography practice.
    Long Z; Walz-Flannigan AI; Littrell LA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):831-836. PubMed ID: 36542418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of entrance surface air kerma due to diagnostic X-ray examinations of adult patients in Uttarakhand, India and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
    Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Raghuvanshi S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 28819817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of an online automatic diagnostic reference levels management system for digital radiography: a pilot experience.
    Ng CK; Sun Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Sep; 103(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 20719401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Study on the effect of setting the region of interest for exposure index computing].
    Hirose S; Matsuzawa H; Hirose A; Kawamoto K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Jan; 71(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25672532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
    Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.