323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35125755)
1. SUVmax/ADC Ratio as a Molecular Imaging Biomarker for Diagnosis of Biopsy-Naïve Primary Prostate Cancer.
Chinnappan S; Chandra P; Kumar JS; Chandran G; Nath S
Indian J Nucl Med; 2021; 36(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 35125755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prebiopsy Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in Detecting Primary Prostate Carcinomas with Prostate-Specific Antigen <50 ng/ml.
Chandra P; Rajaian S; Krishnamurthy K; Murugasen L; Chandran G; Kumar JS; Nath S
Indian J Nucl Med; 2020; 35(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 33642751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combining ADC value of MRI in the diagnosis of naive prostate cancer: Perspective of radiologist.
Wang L; Yu F; Yang L; Zang S; Xue H; Yin X; Guo H; Sun H; Wang F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(36):e20755. PubMed ID: 32898989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).
Wong LM; Sutherland T; Perry E; Tran V; Spelman T; Corcoran N; Lawrentschuk N; Woo H; Lenaghan D; Buchan N; Bax K; Symons J; Saeed Goolam A; Chalasani V; Hegarty J; Thomas L; Christov A; Ng M; Khanani H; Lee SF; Taubman K; Tarlinton L
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of
Nuo Y; Li A; Yang L; Xue H; Wang F; Wang L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 34993060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective Evaluation of
Lopci E; Lughezzani G; Castello A; Saita A; Colombo P; Hurle R; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Casale P; Pietro D; Bevilacqua G; Balzarini L; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):764-771. PubMed ID: 32312701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
Kubihal V; Sharma S; Kumar R; Seth A; Kumar R; Kaushal S; Sarangi J; Gupta R; Das CJ
Indian J Nucl Med; 2021; 36(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 35125753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Yang J; Li J; Xiao L; Zhou M; Fang Z; Cai Y; Tang Y; Hu S
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):81. PubMed ID: 37667341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can the Gleason score be predicted in patients with prostate cancer? A dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,
Akkaya H; Dilek O; Özdemir S; Taş ZA; Öztürk İS; Gülek B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):647-655. PubMed ID: 37395389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of SUV
Uslu-Beşli L; Bakır B; Asa S; Güner E; Demirdağ Ç; Şahin OE; Karayel E; Sağer MS; Sayman HB; Sönmezoğlu K
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2019 Sep; 28(3):104-111. PubMed ID: 31507143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [
Lv J; Yu H; Yin H; Shi Y; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 37940684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incremental value of 68-gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with abnormal prostate-specific antigen and benign transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
Gupta M; Choudhury PS; Rawal S; Gupta G
Urol Ann; 2018; 10(2):150-153. PubMed ID: 29719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Liu C; Liu T; Zhang Z; Zhang N; Du P; Yang Y; Liu Y; Yu W; Li N; Gorin MA; Rowe SP; Zhu H; Yan K; Yang Z
J Nucl Med; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1314-1319. PubMed ID: 32034111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Pepe P; Pepe L; Tamburo M; Marletta G; Savoca F; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2023; 37(3):1318-1322. PubMed ID: 37103095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
