160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35126959)
1. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Wang K; Jing F
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9714369. PubMed ID: 35126959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography in patients suspected of having ectopic pregnancy.
Gramith F; Sirr S; Hollerman J; Hawks L
Minn Med; 1991 Jan; 74(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2002788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the application value of transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.
Hu HJ; Sun J; Feng R; Yu L
World J Clin Cases; 2023 May; 11(13):2945-2955. PubMed ID: 37215424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy type.
Wu Y; Zhou L; Chen L; Zhou Q; Zeng T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(44):e17741. PubMed ID: 31689823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal ultrasonography in first trimester of pregnancy and its comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography.
Kaur A; Kaur A
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2011 Jul; 3(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 21966152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography in the evaluation of pelvic pathology.
Qureshi IA; Ullah H; Akram MH; Ashfaq S; Nayyar S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Jul; 14(7):390-3. PubMed ID: 15279738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Transvaginal sonography and transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the fallopian tubal: a comparative study in 38 cases].
Luo GX; Wang SS; Zhang H; Liu SL
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2002 Nov; 22(11):1046. PubMed ID: 12433648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for early cesarean scar pregnancy].
Liu Q; Zhang R; Wang X; Liu K; Bai G; Huang Y; Zhu H; Yan Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 94(45):3589-92. PubMed ID: 25622841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic management or laparoscopy combined with transvaginal management of type II cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wang HY; Zhang J; Li YN; Wei W; Zhang DW; Lu YQ; Zhang HF
JSLS; 2013; 17(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 23925020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose cesarean scar pregnancies.
Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 127(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 25035091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of placenta previa].
Chen JM; Zhou QC; Wang RR
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2001 Jun; 26(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 12536713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Liu D; Yang M; Wu Q
Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Nov; 486():291-297. PubMed ID: 30102898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological ultrasound types known as 'blob' and 'bagel' signs should be reclassified from suggesting probable to indicating definite tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Nadim B; Infante F; Lu C; Sathasivam N; Condous G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 51(4):543-549. PubMed ID: 28195383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A noninferiority randomized controlled trial to compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonography for eligibility assessment prior to medical abortion.
Fu A; Weber CE; Gilmore E; Davis AR; Hirsch G; Westhoff CL
Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29752922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of sonography for non-invasive detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification: prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study.
Montanari E; Bokor A; Szabó G; Kondo W; Trippia CH; Malzoni M; Di Giovanni A; Tinneberg HR; Oberstein A; Rocha RM; Leonardi M; Condous G; Alsalem H; Keckstein J; Hudelist G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 59(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 34919760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhang Y; Gu Y; Wang JM; Li Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 22640013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound combined with color Doppler ultrasound for early cesarean scar pregnancy.
Shi L; Huang L; Liu L; Yang X; Yao D; Chen D; Xiong J; Duan J
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Oct; 10(10):10486-10494. PubMed ID: 34763495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with successful transabdominal sonography-guided dilation and curettage for early cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wu XQ; Zhang HW; Fang XL; Ding H; Piao L; Joseph Huang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Dec; 131(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 26372348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1890-3. PubMed ID: 25056467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]