239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35127499)
1. MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.
Chen T; Zhang Z; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Wang S; Zhao W; Qian X; Zhou Z; Shen J; Dai Y; Hu J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():792456. PubMed ID: 35127499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis.
Feng X; Chen X; Peng P; Zhou H; Hong Y; Zhu C; Lu L; Xie S; Zhang S; Long L
BMC Urol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):40. PubMed ID: 38365673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of machine learning models based on biparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer].
Qiao XM; Hu CH; Hu S; Hu CH; Wang XM; Shen JK; Ji LB; Song Y; Bao J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 37198106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI.
Song J; Zhao C; Zhang F; Yuan Y; Wang LM; Sah V; Zhang J; Weng W; Yang Z; Wang Z; Wang L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):704-712. PubMed ID: 36464756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis.
Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Daryanani A; Turkbey B
Life (Basel); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35743835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. bpMRI and mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Pan Y; Shen C; Chen X; Cao D; Jiang J; Xu W; Ji C; Pan X; Zheng B
Front Surg; 2022; 9():1096387. PubMed ID: 36726941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions.
Hectors SJ; Chen C; Chen J; Wang J; Gordon S; Yu M; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Sabuncu MR; Margolis DJA; Hu JC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Nov; 54(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 33970516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a nomogram based on biparametric MRI PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Wang Y; Wang L; Tang X; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Zhi B; Niu X
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; 23(1):106. PubMed ID: 37582697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.
Choi MH; Kim CK; Lee YJ; Jung SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):839-846. PubMed ID: 30779662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature.
Zhang L; Zhe X; Tang M; Zhang J; Ren J; Zhang X; Li L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():7830909. PubMed ID: 35024015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Biparametric Prostate MRI, Radiomics, and Kallikreins: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Montoya Perez I; Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Knaapila J; Kekki H; Khan FL; Syrjälä E; Steiner A; Syvänen KT; Verho J; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Riikonen J; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Falagario U; Martini A; Pahikkala T; Pettersson K; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):465-477. PubMed ID: 34227169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
Krauss W; Frey J; Heydorn Lagerlöf J; Lidén M; Thunberg P
Acta Radiol; 2024 Mar; 65(3):307-317. PubMed ID: 38115809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of DCE Utility for PCa Diagnosis Using PI-RADS v2.1: Effects on Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.
Brancato V; Di Costanzo G; Basso L; Tramontano L; Puglia M; Ragozzino A; Cavaliere AC
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32192081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
