192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35128854)
1. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.
Wong M; Amin T; Thanatsis N; Naftalin J; Jurkovic D
J Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 33(2):e22. PubMed ID: 35128854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: prospective comparative study.
Cubo-Abert M; Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Rodríguez-Mías NL; Vera M; Pérez-Hoyos S; Gómez-Cabeza JJ; Gil-Moreno A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 33533532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging for local preoperative staging in endometrial cancer: Nantes local experience].
Coussoou C; Laigle-Quérat V; Loussouarn D; Vaucel E; Frampas E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):374-383. PubMed ID: 32058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spagnol G; Noventa M; Bonaldo G; Marchetti M; Vitagliano A; Laganà AS; Cavallin F; Scioscia M; Saccardi C; Tozzi R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 60(5):604-611. PubMed ID: 35656849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves diagnostic performance in endometrial cancer staging.
Green RW; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 31647145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of ultrasound strategies to assess tumor extension and to predict high-risk endometrial cancer in women from the prospective IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis)-4 cohort.
Verbakel JY; Mascilini F; Wynants L; Fischerova D; Testa AC; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Cibula D; Lindqvist PG; Fruscio R; Haak LA; Opolskiene G; Alcazar JL; Mais V; Carlson JW; Sladkevicius P; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Bosch TVD; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 55(1):115-124. PubMed ID: 31225683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer by 3D Ultrasound and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comparative Study.
Rodríguez-Trujillo A; Martínez-Serrano MJ; Martínez-Román S; Martí C; Buñesch L; Nicolau C; Pahisa J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 27177278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer.
Fischerova D; Frühauf F; Zikan M; Pinkavova I; Kocián R; Dundr P; Nemejcova K; Dusek L; Cibula D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 43(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 24281994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvaginal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrioid Low Grade Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Study.
Gastón B; Muruzábal JC; Lapeña S; Modroño A; Guarch R; García de Eulate I; Alcázar JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):335-342. PubMed ID: 33780025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer by expert and non-expert transvaginal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endometrial histology.
Dueholm M; Hjorth IM; Dahl K; Marinovskij E; Ørtoft G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Aug; 263():181-191. PubMed ID: 34218206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI radiomics improves preoperative diagnostic performance for local staging in patients with endometrial cancer.
Fang R; Lin N; Weng S; Liu K; Chen X; Cao D
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Mar; 49(3):875-887. PubMed ID: 38189937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endometrial cancer off-line staging using two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional volume contrast imaging: Intermethod agreement, interrater reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Green RW; Valentin L; Alcazar JL; Chiappa V; Erdodi B; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Fruscio R; Guerriero S; Graupera B; Jakab A; di Legge A; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Pascual MA; van den Bosch T; Epstein E
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 30029961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of a reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted (rFOV) sequence in assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with clinical FIGO stage I endometrial cancer.
Bhosale P; Ma J; Iyer R; Ramalingam P; Wei W; Soliman P; Frumovitz M; Kundra V
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 26185031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer: interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists.
Eriksson LS; Lindqvist PG; Flöter Rådestad A; Dueholm M; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Jokubkiene L; Leone FP; Savelli L; Sladkevicius P; Testa AC; Van den Bosch T; Ameye L; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 25092412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study.
Cerovac A; Ljuca D; Arnautalic L; Habek D; Bogdanovic G; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic J; Grgic G
Radiol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 56(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 35148470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative deep myometrium assessment in endometrial cancer.
Wu WJ; Yu MS; Su HY; Lin KS; Lu KL; Hwang KS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23915853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis for Predicting the Deep Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Our Experience and Literature Review.
Iitsuka C; Asami Y; Hirose Y; Nagashima M; Mimura T; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Sekizawa A; Matsumoto K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Sep; 47(9):3331-3338. PubMed ID: 34155730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictability of myometrial, lower uterine segment and cervical invasion with 3D transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.
Yildirim N; Saatli B; Kose S; Sancar C; Ulukus C; Koyuncuoglu M; Saygili U; Obuz F
Med Ultrason; 2018 Aug; 20(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 30167589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial infiltration in patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis.
Tameish S; Florez N; Vidal JRP; Chen H; Vara J; Alcázar JL
J Clin Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 51(7):1188-1197. PubMed ID: 37318272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between preoperative transvaginal ultrasound and intraoperative macroscopic examination for assessing myometrial infiltration in low-risk endometrioid carcinoma.
Pineda L; Alcázar JL; Caparrós M; Mínguez JA; Idoate MA; Quiceno H; Solórzano JL; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 26033260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
