These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35131103)

  • 1. In re: the disposition of frozen embryos: 2022.
    Letterie G
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):477-480. PubMed ID: 35131103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
    King M
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
    Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe v Wade and the new Jane Crow: reproductive rights in the age of mass incarceration.
    Paltrow LM
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Jan; 103(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 23153159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.
    Ahnen CD
    Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition.
    Ziegler M
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(2):515-67. PubMed ID: 30707003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unintended consequences: abortion training in the years after Roe v Wade.
    Aksel S; Fein L; Ketterer E; Young E; Backus L
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 103(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 23327239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive rights activism in the post-Roe era.
    Fried MG
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Jan; 103(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 23153156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
    Schaefer K
    Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: in search of a constitutional doctrine (Part 1).
    Leyshon DJ
    Med Law; 1991; 10(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 1886465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
    Roden GJ
    Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.