These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35131505)

  • 41. Electronic health records (EHR) simulation-based training: a scoping review protocol.
    Nuamah JK; Adapa K; Mazur L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036884. PubMed ID: 32788188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records.
    Lewkowicz D; Wohlbrandt A; Boettinger E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):871. PubMed ID: 32933513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Usability Testing of a Complex Clinical Decision Support Tool in the Emergency Department: Lessons Learned.
    Press A; McCullagh L; Khan S; Schachter A; Pardo S; McGinn T
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 2(2):e14. PubMed ID: 27025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature.
    Bryan C; Boren SA
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 18713524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Initial implementation and evaluation of a Hepatitis C treatment clinical decision support system (CDSS): a nurse practitioner-driven quality improvement initiative.
    Fathauer L; Meek J
    Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(3):337-48. PubMed ID: 23646082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC; Ancker JS; Johnson SB; Senathirajah Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Making electronic health records support quality management: A narrative review.
    Triantafillou P
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Aug; 104():105-119. PubMed ID: 28599812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. MHS Genesis Implementation: Strategies in Support of Successful EHR Conversion.
    Woody Ii EW
    Mil Med; 2020 Sep; 185(9-10):e1520-e1527. PubMed ID: 32699887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical Decision Support using a Terminology Server to improve Patient Safety.
    Garcia-Jimenez A; Moreno-Conde A; Martínez-García A; Marín-León I; Medrano-Ortega FJ; Parra-Calderón CL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():150-4. PubMed ID: 25991120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.
    McGinn CA; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Légaré F; Gagnon MP
    BMC Med; 2011 Apr; 9():46. PubMed ID: 21524315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of a Vendor-Developed Opioid Clinical Decision Support Intervention on Adherence to Prescribing Guidelines, Opioid Prescribing, and Rates of Opioid-Related Encounters.
    Pierce RP; Eskridge B; Ross B; Wright M; Selva T
    Appl Clin Inform; 2022 Mar; 13(2):419-430. PubMed ID: 35445387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.
    Nguyen L; Bellucci E; Nguyen LT
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):779-96. PubMed ID: 25085286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of a Web-Based Electronic Health Record on Behavioral Health Service Delivery for Children and Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bruns EJ; Hook AN; Parker EM; Esposito I; Sather A; Parigoris RM; Lyon AR; Hyde KL
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jun; 20(6):e10197. PubMed ID: 29903701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review.
    Fernandes M; Vieira SM; Leite F; Palos C; Finkelstein S; Sousa JMC
    Artif Intell Med; 2020 Jan; 102():101762. PubMed ID: 31980099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Decision Support Tools within the Electronic Health Record.
    Rudolf JW; Dighe AS
    Clin Lab Med; 2019 Jun; 39(2):197-213. PubMed ID: 31036275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development and implementation of a clinical decision support-based initiative to drive intravenous fluid prescribing.
    Spiegel MC; Simpson AN; Philip A; Bell CM; Nadig NR; Ford DW; Goodwin AJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Dec; 156():104619. PubMed ID: 34673308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening.
    Wagholikar KB; MacLaughlin KL; Henry MR; Greenes RA; Hankey RA; Liu H; Chaudhry R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22542812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taheri Moghadam S; Sadoughi F; Velayati F; Ehsanzadeh SJ; Poursharif S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Mar; 21(1):98. PubMed ID: 33691690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Drug Allergy Checking: Systematic Review.
    Légat L; Van Laere S; Nyssen M; Steurbaut S; Dupont AG; Cornu P
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e258. PubMed ID: 30194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.