BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35133138)

  • 1. Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(4):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 35133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.
    Jokinen EM; Niemeläinen M; Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Lätti S; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT; Niinivehmas SP
    Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Practical Perspective: The Effect of Ligand Conformers on the Negative Image-Based Screening.
    Ahinko M; Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 31174295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3584-3599. PubMed ID: 31290660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fragment- and negative image-based screening of phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors.
    Jokinen EM; Postila PA; Ahinko M; Niinivehmas S; Pentikäinen OT
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 Oct; 94(4):1799-1812. PubMed ID: 31260165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of virtual high-throughput screening methods for the identification of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
    Niinivehmas SP; Virtanen SI; Lehtonen JV; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1353-63. PubMed ID: 21591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)-based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening.
    Spiegel J; Senderowitz H
    Mol Inform; 2022 Nov; 41(11):e2200034. PubMed ID: 35790469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comprehensive Docking and MM/GBSA Rescoring Study of Ligand Recognition upon Binding Antithrombin.
    Zhang X; Perez-Sanchez H; Lightstone FC
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(14):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 27852201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrafast protein structure-based virtual screening with Panther.
    Niinivehmas SP; Salokas K; Lätti S; Raunio H; Pentikäinen OT
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Oct; 29(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 26407559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison between Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)-Based and Docking-Based Virtual Screening.
    Spiegel J; Senderowitz H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 35008467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ES-Screen: A Novel Electrostatics-Driven Method for Drug Discovery Virtual Screening.
    Issa NT; Byers SW; Dakshanamurthy S
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 36499162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structure-based virtual screening for novel ligands.
    Pitt WR; Calmiano MD; Kroeplien B; Taylor RD; Turner JP; King MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():501-19. PubMed ID: 23729265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deciphering the Interactions of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Traditional Medicinal Plants against Alzheimer's Diseases via Pharmacophore Modeling, Auto-QSAR, and Molecular Docking Approaches.
    Ojo OA; Ojo AB; Okolie C; Nwakama MC; Iyobhebhe M; Evbuomwan IO; Nwonuma CO; Maimako RF; Adegboyega AE; Taiwo OA; Alsharif KF; Batiha GE
    Molecules; 2021 Apr; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 33915968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.