These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35133492)

  • 1. Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time-based concealed information test: the effect of observation time.
    Sauerland M; Koller D; Bastiaens A; Verschuere B
    Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):281-293. PubMed ID: 35133492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation.
    Georgiadou K; Chronos A; Verschuere B; Sauerland M
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2278-2288. PubMed ID: 30635707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses.
    Sauerland M; Wolfs ACF; Crans S; Verschuere B
    Psychol Res; 2019 Sep; 83(6):1210-1222. PubMed ID: 29181584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving face identification of mask-wearing individuals.
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Mar; 7(1):27. PubMed ID: 35347475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.
    Deffenbacher KA; Bornstein BH; Penrod SD; McGorty EK
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):687-706. PubMed ID: 15732653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Apr; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27180511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The aging eyewitness: effects of age on face, delay, and source-memory ability.
    Memon A; Bartlett J; Rose R; Gray C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2003 Nov; 58(6):P338-45. PubMed ID: 14614118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in eyewitness accuracy across multiple lineups of faces.
    Russ AJ; Sauerland M; Lee CE; Bindemann M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3():30. PubMed ID: 30148204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.
    Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15571. PubMed ID: 36114219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of disguise on identification decisions and confidence with simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Bertrand MI; Kalmet N; Melsom EI; Lindsay RCL
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 33444064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of encoding duration on implicit and explicit eyewitness memory.
    Carol RN; Schreiber Compo N
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 May; 61():117-128. PubMed ID: 29482915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.