These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35133553)

  • 41. Construal processes and trait ambiguity: implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment.
    Hayes AF; Dunning D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Mar; 72(3):664-77. PubMed ID: 9120790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Meta-Analysis of the Faking Resistance of Forced-Choice Personality Inventories.
    Martínez A; Salgado JF
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():732241. PubMed ID: 34659043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.
    Youyou W; Kosinski M; Stillwell D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jan; 112(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 25583507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The nature of faking: A homogeneous and predictable construct?
    Bensch D; Maaß U; Greiff S; Horstmann KT; Ziegler M
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Apr; 31(4):532-544. PubMed ID: 30869958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
    Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Thurstonian Scaling of Compositional Questionnaire Data.
    Brown A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):345-56. PubMed ID: 27054408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
    Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.
    Wetzel E; Frick S
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Second-Order Probability Matching Priors for the Person Parameter in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Liu Y; Hannig J; Pal Majumder A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):701-718. PubMed ID: 31264028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of Judgments of Personality Based on Textual Information on Major Life Domains.
    Borkenau P; Mosch A; Tandler N; Wolf A
    J Pers; 2016 Apr; 84(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 25417640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: the use of chronically accessible and stable sources.
    Schimmack U; Diener E; Oishi S
    J Pers; 2002 Jun; 70(3):345-84. PubMed ID: 12049164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an indicator for counterproductive work behavior: Comparing validity in applicant, honest, and directed faking conditions.
    Trent JD; Barron LG; Rose MR; Carretta TR
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 38536272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The self and social judgment: effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.
    Lambert AJ; Wedell DH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Dec; 61(6):884-97. PubMed ID: 1774627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
    Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
    Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.