184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35134672)
21. Perioperative management and prevention of postoperative complications in patients undergoing cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone.
Chen L; Li J; Huang S; Ma J; Zhou L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Sep; 84():71-78. PubMed ID: 37327735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Allergic Epidural Effusion Following Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty.
Qiu S; You W; Wang H; Zhou X; Yang X
J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(3):e241-e243. PubMed ID: 30730518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical Outcomes After Cranioplasty With Titanium Mesh, Polyetheretherketone, or Composite Bone Cement: A Retrospective Study.
Chen K; Liang W; Zhu Q; Shen H; Yang Y; Li Y; Li H; Wang Y; Qian R
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):2246-2251. PubMed ID: 37470720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. A prospective series analyzing complications and clinical improvement.
Paredes I; Castaño-León AM; Munarriz PM; Martínez-Perez R; Cepeda S; Sanz R; Alén JF; Lagares A
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2015; 26(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 25497290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of complications in cranioplasty with various materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu L; Lu ST; Liu AH; Hou WB; Cao WR; Zhou C; Yin YX; Yuan KS; Liu HJ; Zhang MG; Zhang HJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 34(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 32233810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cranioplasty in Oman: Retrospective review of cases from the National Craniofacial Center 2012-2022.
Al Alawi K; Al Furqani A; Al Shaqsi S; Shummo M; Al Jabri A; Al Balushi T
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2024 May; 24(2):250-258. PubMed ID: 38828246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.
Ganau M; Cebula H; Fricia M; Zaed I; Todeschi J; Scibilia A; Gallinaro P; Coca A; Chaussemy D; Ollivier I; Ligarotti GKI; des Neiges Santin M; Proust F; Chibbaro S
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():98-103. PubMed ID: 32033859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants.
Gilardino MS; Karunanayake M; Al-Humsi T; Izadpanah A; Al-Ajmi H; Marcoux J; Atkinson J; Farmer JP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 25534061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reconstruction of Cranial Vault Defect with Polyetheretherketone Implants.
Brandicourt P; Delanoé F; Roux FE; Jalbert F; Brauge D; Lauwers F
World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():783-789. PubMed ID: 28434964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing.
Servadei F; Iaccarino C
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25153284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cranioplasty outcomes and associated complications: A single-centre observational study.
Liang ES; Tipper G; Hunt L; Gan PY
Br J Neurosurg; 2016; 30(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 26328774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis.
Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Koper D; Poort-Ter Laak M; Kessler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1948-51. PubMed ID: 25443869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-Step Customized PEEK Cranioplasty After 3D Printed Resection Template Assisted Surgery for a Frontal Intraosseous Meningioma: A Case Report.
Barros A; Brauge D; QuÉhan R; Cavallier Z; Roux FE; Moyse E
Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(1):142-147. PubMed ID: 33372259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Klieverik VM; Miller KJ; Han KS; Singhal A; Vassilyadi M; Touchette CJ; Weil AG; Woerdeman PA
Childs Nerv Syst; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30554262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].
Foletti JM; Lari N; Dumas P; Compes P; Guyot L
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2012 Dec; 113(6):468-71. PubMed ID: 23182690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Polyether Ether Ketone Cranioplasties Are Permeable to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Mursch K; Behnke-Mursch J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():142-143. PubMed ID: 29920388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
