These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3513493)

  • 1. Digital subtraction angiography: a comparison of 512(2) and 1024(2) imaging.
    Gomes AS; Papin PJ; Mankovich NJ; Lois JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Apr; 146(4):835-8. PubMed ID: 3513493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography: overview of technical principles.
    Harrington DP; Boxt LM; Murray PD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 6751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.
    Arnold BA; Scheibe PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Equipment and methodologic parameters of radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 2652271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of CRT images of digitized film angiographs].
    Mashita S; Ishigaki T; Ikeda M; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):1025-37. PubMed ID: 2594482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography systems: assessing performance with phantoms.
    Goodsitt MM; Abbate L; Hesselink JR
    Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 3895295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Chan HP; Giger ML; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803. PubMed ID: 3890012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction cerebral angiography by intraarterial injection: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Brant-Zawadzki M; Gould R; Norman D; Newton TH; Lane B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Feb; 140(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 6336873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement of image-producing properties of DSA equipment].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Freimarck RD
    Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6431530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CCD camera for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Qian YJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18215878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of the lead oxide vidicon for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 18222858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Improvement of image quality in digital subtraction angiography using a variable aperture].
    Herter M; Harder T; Lackner K
    Rontgenblatter; 1984 Jul; 37(7):245-8. PubMed ID: 6379842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast administration and techniques of digital subtraction angiography performance.
    Saddekni S; Sos TA; Srur M; Cohn DJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 3887486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ideal configuration for intravenous digital subtraction angiography machine.
    Ovitt TW; Fisher HD
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1983; 6(4-6):300-2. PubMed ID: 6360372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.