138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35135676)
1. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fit and accuracy of single crowns fabricated from self-glazed zirconia compared with milled zirconia.
Marouki C; Shamon A; Svanborg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 36959004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with the nanoparticle jetting technique.
Lyu J; Yang X; Li Y; Tan J; Liu X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37217418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knife-edged crown fabricated by 3-dimensional gel deposition and soft milling.
Li R; Li W; Wang Y; Sun Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 34052028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional trueness and margin quality of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition.
Li R; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Shen Z; Sun Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):478-484. PubMed ID: 32063530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
