These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35135703)

  • 1. Efficacy of electromagnetic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on high-density ureteral stones.
    Bongrand B; Millet I; Autissier C; Faget C; Robert M
    Prog Urol; 2022 Jul; 32(8-9):608-615. PubMed ID: 35135703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones?
    Ibrahim A; Elatreisy A; Khogeer A; Ahmadi A; Mishra S; Faisal M; Sabnis R; Aube-Peterkin M; Carrier S; Ganpule A; Desai M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Dec; 94(4):439-442. PubMed ID: 36576455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.
    Guler Y; Erbin A; Kafkasli A; Ozmerdiven G
    Urolithiasis; 2021 Feb; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32279108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
    Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
    J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postshockwave lithotripsy outcome evaluation in ureteral stones: comparison between noncontrast computed tomography and plain abdominal radiography.
    Soydan H; Akyol I; Senkul T; Ates F; Uguz S; Yilmaz O; Baykal K
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):803-6. PubMed ID: 22250983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Gökce MI; Esen B; Gülpınar B; Süer E; Gülpınar Ö
    J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1009-16. PubMed ID: 27392789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
    Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.
    Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.
    Lee JY; Kim JH; Kang DH; Chung DY; Lee DH; Do Jung H; Kwon JK; Cho KS
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23988. PubMed ID: 27035621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of Patient Age and Stone Density in Predicting Outcomes of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Lower Ureteral Stones.
    Alsmadi J
    Med Arch; 2023; 77(3):222-226. PubMed ID: 37700921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
    Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.
    Zhang L; Li J; Pan C; Zhan Y; Li Z; Bai S
    Urolithiasis; 2022 Dec; 51(1):26. PubMed ID: 36585472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
    Lim KH; Jung JH; Kwon JH; Lee YS; Bae J; Cho MC; Lee KS; Lee HW
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25598937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.