These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35138510)

  • 1. Circular Stapler Method for Avoiding Stricture of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
    Shiraishi O; Yasuda T; Kato H; Momose K; Hiraki Y; Yasuda A; Shinkai M; Imano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Apr; 26(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 35138510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
    Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a Long Linear Staplers on the Incidence of Stricture after Triangulating Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
    Toyota S; Kimura Y; Jogo T; Hu Q; Hokonohara K; Nakanishi R; Hisamatsu Y; Ando K; Oki E; Mori M
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jan; 31(4):453-456. PubMed ID: 33492082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
    Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
    Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of greater curvature and lesser curvature circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Sasaki K; Omoto I; Uchikado Y; Okumura H; Noda M; Tsuruda Y; Kita Y; Arigami T; Mori S; Kurahara H; Nakajyo A; Koriyama C; Natsugoe S; Ohtsuka T
    Surg Today; 2021 Apr; 51(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 32974752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
    Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
    Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
    Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
    BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.