189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35138566)
1. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion-a Review.
Matias CM; Velagapudi L; Montenegro TS; Heller JE
Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2022 Mar; 26(3):173-182. PubMed ID: 35138566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.
Chang E; Rains C; Ali R; Wines RC; Kahwati LC
Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 35017057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.
Sturesson B; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Dengler J
Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27179664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?
Copay AG; Cher DJ
Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 26245709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?
Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1831-8. PubMed ID: 24519569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
Dengler JD; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Gaetani P; van Eeckhoven E; Cher D; Sturesson B
Pain Physician; 2017 Sep; 20(6):537-550. PubMed ID: 28934785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Claus CF; Lytle E; Kaufmann A; Tong D; Bahoura M; Garmo L; Richards B; Soo TM; Houseman C
World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e745-e750. PubMed ID: 31605853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.
Shaffrey CI; Smith JS
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(2 Suppl):Editorial. PubMed ID: 23829837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Whang P; Cher D; Polly D; Frank C; Lockstadt H; Glaser J; Limoni R; Sembrano J
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25785242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.
Polly DW; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Harvey CF; Lockstadt H; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Sembrano JN;
Neurosurgery; 2015 Nov; 77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. PubMed ID: 26291338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.
Vanaclocha V; Herrera JM; Sáiz-Sapena N; Rivera-Paz M; Verdú-López F
Neurosurgery; 2018 Jan; 82(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 28431026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ghaddaf AA; Alsharef JF; Alsharef NK; Alsaegh MH; Alshaban RM; Almutairi AO; Abualola AH; Alshehri MS
Can J Surg; 2024; 67(1):E16-E26. PubMed ID: 38278549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Methodology - Minimally Invasive Compared to Screw-Type Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tran ZV; Ivashchenko A; Brooks L
Pain Physician; 2019 Jan; 22(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 30700066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results.
Hermans SMM; Knoef RJH; Schuermans VNE; Schotanus MGM; Nellensteijn JM; van Santbrink H; Curfs I; van Hemert WLW
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 17(1):570. PubMed ID: 36575465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.
Duhon BS; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Lockstadt H; Kovalsky D; Soo CL
Med Devices (Auckl); 2013; 6():219-29. PubMed ID: 24363562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.
Kube RA; Muir JM
Open Orthop J; 2016; 10():679-689. PubMed ID: 28144378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique.
Wise CL; Dall BE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):579-84. PubMed ID: 19057252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical and clinical efficacy of sacroiliac joint fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Zaidi HA; Montoure AJ; Dickman CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25840040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.
Duhon BS; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Kovalsky DA; Lockstadt H;
Global Spine J; 2016 May; 6(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 27099817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacroiliac joint fusion VS conservative management for chronic low back pain attributed to the sacroiliac joint: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Chen LY; Liang HD; Qin QN; Tian TZ; Liu BX; Shi M; Cai YF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23223. PubMed ID: 33181705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
