These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35139235)
1. Improvement in Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK Structure by Nonsolvent Vapor Annealing. Chen W; Zhang X; Tan D; Xu P; Yang B; Shi K; Zhu B; Liu Q; Lei Y; Liu S; Xue L Macromol Rapid Commun; 2022 Apr; 43(7):e2100874. PubMed ID: 35139235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interlayer bonding strength of 3D printed PEEK specimens. Liaw CY; Tolbert JW; Chow LW; Guvendiren M Soft Matter; 2021 May; 17(18):4775-4789. PubMed ID: 33870997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does annealing improve the interlayer adhesion and structural integrity of FFF 3D printed PEEK lumbar spinal cages? Basgul C; Yu T; MacDonald DW; Siskey R; Marcolongo M; Kurtz SM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103455. PubMed ID: 31610355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-Specific Surgical Implants Made of 3D Printed PEEK: Material, Technology, and Scope of Surgical Application. Honigmann P; Sharma N; Okolo B; Popp U; Msallem B; Thieringer FM Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4520636. PubMed ID: 29713642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites. Zheng J; Kang J; Sun C; Yang C; Wang L; Li D J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104475. PubMed ID: 33773239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D printing of PEEK and its composite to increase biointerfaces as a biomedical material- A review. Oladapo BI; Zahedi SA; Ismail SO; Omigbodun FT Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2021 Jul; 203():111726. PubMed ID: 33865088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Research Progress of 3D-Printed Polyetheretherketone in Implantable Medical Devices]. Zhang S Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2024 May; 48(3):251-256. PubMed ID: 38863089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additively-manufactured PEEK/HA porous scaffolds with highly-controllable mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility. Zheng J; Zhao H; Dong E; Kang J; Liu C; Sun C; Li D; Wang L Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Sep; 128():112333. PubMed ID: 34474884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Point-of-Care 3-Dimensional-Printed Polyetheretherketone Customized Implants for Cranioplastic Surgery of Large Skull Defects. Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Griessenauer CJ; Gaggl A; Wurm W; Enzinger S Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2024 Oct; 27(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 39283099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of rGO-coated PEEK and lattice on bone implant. Oladapo BI; Ismail SO; Ikumapayi OM; Karagiannidis PG Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2022 Aug; 216():112583. PubMed ID: 35662072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A balance of biocompatibility and antibacterial capability of 3D printed PEEK implants with natural totarol coating. Han X; Sharma N; Xu Z; Krajewski S; Li P; Spintzyk S; Lv L; Zhou Y; Thieringer FM; Rupp F Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):674-688. PubMed ID: 38388252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS. Wu W; Geng P; Li G; Zhao D; Zhang H; Zhao J Materials (Basel); 2015 Sep; 8(9):5834-5846. PubMed ID: 28793537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated PEEK for biomedical applications depending on additive manufacturing parameters. Wang Y; Müller WD; Rumjahn A; Schmidt F; Schwitalla AD J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104250. PubMed ID: 33302091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D printed PEEK/HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive potential. Manzoor F; Golbang A; Jindal S; Dixon D; McIlhagger A; Harkin-Jones E; Crawford D; Mancuso E J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Sep; 121():104601. PubMed ID: 34077906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tailoring the biologic responses of 3D printed PEEK medical implants by plasma functionalization. Han X; Sharma N; Spintzyk S; Zhou Y; Xu Z; Thieringer FM; Rupp F Dent Mater; 2022 Jul; 38(7):1083-1098. PubMed ID: 35562293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process. Jung HD; Jang TS; Lee JE; Park SJ; Son Y; Park SH Biofabrication; 2019 Aug; 11(4):045014. PubMed ID: 31365916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and fit of 3D-printed polyetheretherketone removable partial dentures. Guo F; Huang S; Liu N; Hu M; Shi C; Li D; Liu C Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):816-823. PubMed ID: 35858792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-printed polyether-ether ketone/carboxymethyl cellulose scaffolds coated with Zn-Mn doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles. Mughal A; Gillani SMH; Ahmed S; Fatima D; Hussain R; Manzur J; Nawaz MH; Minhas B; Shoaib Butt M; Bodaghi M; Ur Rehman MA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Aug; 156():106581. PubMed ID: 38776740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]