These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35140122)

  • 1. Bias Reduction through Analysis of Competing Events (BRACE) Correction to Address Cancer Treatment Selection Bias in Observational Data.
    Williamson CW; Nelson TJ; Thompson CA; Vitzthum LK; Zakeri K; Riviere PJ; Bryant AK; Sharabi AB; Zou J; Mell LK
    Clin Cancer Res; 2022 May; 28(9):1832-1840. PubMed ID: 35140122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
    Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
    Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustment for time-dependent unmeasured confounders in marginal structural Cox models using validation sample data.
    Burne RM; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 28835193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.
    Rassen JA; Shelat AA; Franklin JM; Glynn RJ; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2013 May; 24(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 23532053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5642-5655. PubMed ID: 27549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simulation study of finite-sample properties of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models.
    Westreich D; Cole SR; Schisterman EF; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2098-109. PubMed ID: 22492660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.
    Lu B; Cai D; Tong X
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 29399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted competing risks analysis: an application on long-term risk of urinary adverse events after prostate cancer treatments.
    Bolch CA; Chu H; Jarosek S; Cole SR; Elliott S; Virnig B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):93. PubMed ID: 28693428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.
    Galadima HI; McClish DK
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31111682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association Between Alzheimer Disease and Cancer With Evaluation of Study Biases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ospina-Romero M; Glymour MM; Hayes-Larson E; Mayeda ER; Graff RE; Brenowitz WD; Ackley SF; Witte JS; Kobayashi LC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025515. PubMed ID: 33185677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local Therapy Improves Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Gazdovich S; Budäus L; Zaffuto E; Briganti A; Abdollah F; Montorsi F; Schiffmann J; Menon M; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Chun F; Steuber T; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 28385454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of methods to estimate the hazard ratio under conditions of time-varying confounding and nonpositivity.
    Naimi AI; Cole SR; Westreich DJ; Richardson DB
    Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):718-23. PubMed ID: 21747286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity Score Weighting and Trimming Strategies for Reducing Variance and Bias of Treatment Effect Estimates: A Simulation Study.
    Stürmer T; Webster-Clark M; Lund JL; Wyss R; Ellis AR; Lunt M; Rothman KJ; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1659-1670. PubMed ID: 33615349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Apr; 5(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 20949126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse probability weighting for self-selection bias correction in the investigation of social inequality in mortality.
    Petersen GL; Jørgensen TSH; Mathisen J; Osler M; Mortensen EL; Molbo D; Hougaard CØ; Lange T; Lund R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 53(4):. PubMed ID: 38996447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.