These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35140566)

  • 21. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing a Fully Automated Cephalometric Tracing Method to a Manual Tracing Method for Orthodontic Diagnosis.
    Tsolakis IA; Tsolakis AI; Elshebiny T; Matthaios S; Palomo JM
    J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Srivastava K; Bhushan R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2014; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25737917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Picture archiving and communications systems: a study of reliability of orthodontic cephalometric analysis.
    Tan SS; Ahmad S; Moles DR; Cunningham SJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 21106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software.
    Livas C; Delli K; Spijkervet FKL; Vissink A; Dijkstra PU
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):889-896. PubMed ID: 31282737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the influence of patient positioning on the reliability of lateral cephalometry.
    David OT; Tuce RA; Munteanu O; Neagu A; Panainte I
    Radiol Med; 2017 Jul; 122(7):520-529. PubMed ID: 28271360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Reliability of Three-Dimensional Landmark-Based Craniomaxillofacial and Airway Cephalometric Analysis.
    Yao K; Xie Y; Xia L; Wei S; Yu W; Shen G
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 37510103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
    Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproducibility of Computerized Cephalometric Analysis Software Compared with Conventional Manual Tracing for Analyzing Skeletal Stability After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Thet PH; Kaboosaya B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 38105843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.
    Durão AP; Morosolli A; Pittayapat P; Bolstad N; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Dec; 45(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 26730368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements.
    Kusnoto B; Evans CA; BeGole EA; de Rijk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 10511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlation Assessment between Three-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Scan and Lateral Cephalometric Radiography in Orthodontic Diagnosis.
    Zecca PA; Fastuca R; Beretta M; Caprioglio A; Macchi A
    Int J Dent; 2016; 2016():1473918. PubMed ID: 27313615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
    Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.
    Nikneshan S; Mohseni S; Nouri M; Hadian H; Kharazifard MJ
    Iran J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(2):e19302. PubMed ID: 26060555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?
    Silva TP; Hughes MM; Menezes LDS; de Melo MFB; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20200548. PubMed ID: 33882247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study.
    Mohan A; Sivakumar A; Nalabothu P
    BDJ Open; 2021 Jun; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 34140466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is There Any Difference Between Gonial Angle Values Measured on Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Orthopantomograms?
    Kaya D
    Turk J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 33(2):72-76. PubMed ID: 32637186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.