These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35140664)

  • 1. Gamma Oscillations in the Temporal Pole Reflect the Contribution of Approach and Avoidance Motivational Systems to the Processing of Fear and Anger Words.
    Santaniello G; Ferré P; Sanchez-Carmona A; Huete-Pérez D; Albert J; Hinojosa JA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():802290. PubMed ID: 35140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does it matter if we approach or withdraw when reading? A comparison of fear-related words and anger-related words.
    Huete-Pérez D; Haro J; Hinojosa JA; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():73-85. PubMed ID: 31125899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approach and Withdrawal Tendencies during Written Word Processing: Effects of Task, Emotional Valence, and Emotional Arousal.
    Citron FM; Abugaber D; Herbert C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1935. PubMed ID: 26779067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical Oscillatory Mechanisms Supporting the Control of Human Social-Emotional Actions.
    Bramson B; Jensen O; Toni I; Roelofs K
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(25):5739-5749. PubMed ID: 29793973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories.
    Kapucu A; Kılıç A; Özkılıç Y; Sarıbaz B
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Feb; 124(1):188-209. PubMed ID: 30514162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework.
    Citron FM; Gray MA; Critchley HD; Weekes BS; Ferstl EC
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56(100):79-89. PubMed ID: 24440410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valence evaluation with approaching or withdrawing cues: directly testing valence-arousal conflict theory.
    Wang YM; Li T; Li L
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Jun; 32(4):904-912. PubMed ID: 28722534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It depends: Approach and avoidance reactions to emotional expressions are influenced by the contrast emotions presented in the task.
    Paulus A; Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 26322690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.
    Yao Z; Yu D; Wang L; Zhu X; Guo J; Wang Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():231-242. PubMed ID: 27432482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separating emotion and motivational direction in fear and anger: effects on frontal asymmetry.
    Wacker J; Heldmann M; Stemmler G
    Emotion; 2003 Jun; 3(2):167-93. PubMed ID: 12899417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional norms for 524 French personality trait words.
    Ric F; Alexopoulos T; Muller D; Aubé B
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):414-21. PubMed ID: 23263927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger.
    Elkjaer E; Kuppens P; Mikkelsen MB; O'Toole MS
    Brain Behav; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e3247. PubMed ID: 37679879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Peltola MJ; Linna-Aho K; Ruuhiala HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fronto-temporal brain activity and connectivity track implicit attention to positive and negative social words in a novel socio-emotional Stroop task.
    Arioli M; Basso G; Poggi P; Canessa N
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117580. PubMed ID: 33221447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.
    Carver CS; Harmon-Jones E
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):183-204. PubMed ID: 19254075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating emotions specific to the sexual response into theories of emotion using the Indiana Sexual and Affective Word Set.
    Stevenson RA; Stevenson LD; Rupp HA; Kim S; Janssen E; James TW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 20953902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moved by words: Affective ratings for a set of 2,266 Spanish words in five discrete emotion categories.
    Ferré P; Guasch M; Martínez-García N; Fraga I; Hinojosa JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1082-1094. PubMed ID: 27383750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anger and associated experiences of sadness, fear, valence, arousal, and dominance evoked by visual scenes.
    Javela JJ; Mercadillo RE; Martín Ramírez J
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 19320198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vivid: How valence and arousal influence word processing under different task demands.
    Delaney-Busch N; Wilkie G; Kuperberg G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):415-32. PubMed ID: 26833048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity.
    Harmon-Jones E
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Oct; 67(1-2):51-76. PubMed ID: 15130525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.