These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514106)

  • 1. Cross-sectional clinical study of quality of amalgam restorations, oral health and prevalence of recurrent caries.
    Eriksen HM; Bjertness E; Hansen BF
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Feb; 14(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 3514106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent enamel caries, restoration of marginal integrity, and oral hygiene status.
    Goldberg J; Tanzer J; Munster E; Amara J; Thal F; Birkhed D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1981 May; 102(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 6972399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
    Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations.
    Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caries prevalence of 35-year-old Oslo citizens in 1973 and 1984.
    Bjertness E; Eriksen HM; Hansen BF
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Oct; 14(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 3466748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach.
    Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Vanloy A; Declerck D; Lambrechts P; Peumans M; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):683-691. PubMed ID: 31123872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations.
    Akerboom HB; Advokaat JG; Van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Feb; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8432106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations.
    Hewlett ER; Atchison KA; White SC; Flack V
    J Dent Res; 1993 Dec; 72(12):1604-8. PubMed ID: 8254130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The age of restorations in situ.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA; Qvist V
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1994 Aug; 52(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 7985509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Relationship of Caries Risk and Oral Hygiene Level with Placement and Replacement of Dental Restorations.
    Noaman BR; Fattah LD
    Acta Med Acad; 2021 Dec; 50(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 35164519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.