These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35141290)
1. WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI. Ferdian E; Dubowitz DJ; Mauger CA; Wang A; Young AA Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():769927. PubMed ID: 35141290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wall Shear Stress Estimation for 4D Flow MRI Using Navier-Stokes Equation Correction. Zhang J; Rothenberger SM; Brindise MC; Markl M; Rayz VL; Vlachos PP Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1810-1825. PubMed ID: 35943617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI. Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wall shear stress estimation in the aorta: Impact of wall motion, spatiotemporal resolution, and phase noise. Zimmermann J; Demedts D; Mirzaee H; Ewert P; Stern H; Meierhofer C; Menze B; Hennemuth A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29607574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel and facile criterion to assess the accuracy of WSS estimation by 4D flow MRI. Ko S; Yang B; Cho JH; Lee J; Song S Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():95-103. PubMed ID: 30743192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of 4D flow displacement artifacts on wall shear stress estimation. Schmidt S; Flassbeck S; Schmelter S; Schmeyer E; Ladd ME; Schmitter S Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jun; 85(6):3154-3168. PubMed ID: 33421221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of turbulent blood flow and wall shear stress in aortic coarctation using image-based simulations. Perinajová R; Juffermans JF; Mercado JL; Aben JP; Ledoux L; Westenberg JJM; Lamb HJ; Kenjereš S Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 34419047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review. Szajer J; Ho-Shon K Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 48():62-69. PubMed ID: 29223732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta. Cherry M; Khatir Z; Khan A; Bissell M Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15128. PubMed ID: 36068322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta. van Ooij P; Powell AL; Potters WV; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):236-48. PubMed ID: 26140480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of 4D flow MRI velocity field in the aorta with divergence-free smoothing. Gao Q; Liu X; Wang H; Wu P; Jin M; Wei R; Wang W; Niu Z; Zhao S; Li F Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Nov; 59(11-12):2237-2252. PubMed ID: 34528164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards quantitative evaluation of wall shear stress from 4D flow imaging. Levilly S; Castagna M; Idier J; Bonnefoy F; Le Touzé D; Moussaoui S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Serfaty JM Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():232-243. PubMed ID: 32889090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries. Cibis M; Potters WV; Gijsen FJ; Marquering H; vanBavel E; van der Steen AF; Nederveen AJ; Wentzel JJ NMR Biomed; 2014 Jul; 27(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24817676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D Quantification of Wall Shear Stress and Oscillatory Shear Index Using a Finite-Element Method in 3D CINE PC-MRI Data of the Thoracic Aorta. Sotelo J; Urbina J; Valverde I; Tejos C; Irarrazaval P; Andia ME; Uribe S; Hurtado DE IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1475-87. PubMed ID: 26780787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial resolution and velocity field improvement of 4D-flow MRI. Callaghan FM; Grieve SM Magn Reson Med; 2017 Nov; 78(5):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27885707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An LDV based method to quantify the error of PC-MRI derived Wall Shear Stress measurement. Castagna M; Levilly S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Moussaoui S; Rousset JM; Bonnefoy F; Idier J; Serfaty JM; Le Touzé D Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):4112. PubMed ID: 33603139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pseudo-Spectral Method for Wall Shear Stress Estimation from Doppler Ultrasound Imaging in Coronary Arteries. Martín Tempestti J; Kim S; Lindsey BD; Veneziani A Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39103664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward an accurate estimation of wall shear stress from 4D flow magnetic resonance downstream of a severe stenosis. Corso P; Walheim J; Dillinger H; Giannakopoulos G; Gülan U; Frouzakis CE; Kozerke S; Holzner M Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1531-1543. PubMed ID: 33914962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]