164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35142103)
1. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge.
Barsic Ostojic S; Grbanovic L; Tonklin A; Kovacevic L; Marusic Z; Prutki M
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Oct; 5(10):e1602. PubMed ID: 35142103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the role of breast MRI in the management of women with pathologic nipple discharge and normal conventional imaging?
Avdan Aslan A; Gültekin S
Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Oct; 192(5):2331-2335. PubMed ID: 36409422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge.
Moschetta M; De Ruvo V; Drago A; Troiano N; Paolicelli S; Rubini G; Stabile Ianora AA; Telegrafo M
Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Aug; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 32748294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective statistical analysis on the diagnostic value of ductography based on lesion pathology in patients presenting with nipple discharge.
Srinivasan A; Nia E; Gupta M; Sun J; Leung JW
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):585-589. PubMed ID: 31087380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study.
Boisserie-Lacroix M; Doutriaux-Dumoulin I; Chopier J; Boyer B; Depetiteville MP; Hoppe S; Brouste V; Chamming's F
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7783-7791. PubMed ID: 33846843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
Huang JL; Lin Q
Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. JOURNAL CLUB: Diagnostic Utility of MRI After Negative or Inconclusive Mammography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
Bahl M; Gadd MA; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1404-1410. PubMed ID: 28898125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Galactography in Detecting Lesions in Patients With Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
Jung HK; Park YM; Baek HJ; Choo HJ; Kim EK; Kim DW; Lee SJ; Lee JH
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Mar; 35(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 29768286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography.
Choi Y; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 23(9):866-877. PubMed ID: 36047541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between second-look ultrasound and second-look digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of additional lesions with presurgical CESM.
Bellini C; Bicchierai G; Amato F; Savi E; De Benedetto D; Di Naro F; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Miele V; Nori J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210927. PubMed ID: 35451312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nipple Discharge Imaging Evaluation with Mammography, Ultrasound, Galactography, and MRI.
Chung HL; Bevers TB; Legha RS; Speer ME; Tso HH; Sun J; Leung JWT
Acad Radiol; 2023 May; 30(5):783-797. PubMed ID: 35760711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nipple Discharge: Current Clinical and Imaging Evaluation.
Gupta D; Mendelson EB; Karst I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):330-339. PubMed ID: 33295815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
