These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35142980)

  • 1. Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.
    Tomov ST; Gorchev GA; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova NH; Tomova VD; Gorcheva ZV; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1367-1382. PubMed ID: 35142980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
    Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
    Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer.
    El-Achi V; Weishaupt J; Carter J; Saidi S
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 32737804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in People With Obesity: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(6):1-70. PubMed ID: 38026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
    He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
    Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
    Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
    Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
    Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Eoh KJ; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Shin M; Kim SJ; Kim JA; Kim YT
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Apr; 53(2):549-557. PubMed ID: 33091967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.