BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35142980)

  • 1. Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.
    Tomov ST; Gorchev GA; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova NH; Tomova VD; Gorcheva ZV; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1367-1382. PubMed ID: 35142980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
    Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
    Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer.
    El-Achi V; Weishaupt J; Carter J; Saidi S
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 32737804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in People With Obesity: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(6):1-70. PubMed ID: 38026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
    He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
    Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
    Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
    Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
    Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Eoh KJ; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Shin M; Kim SJ; Kim JA; Kim YT
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Apr; 53(2):549-557. PubMed ID: 33091967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.