155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35143088)
1. Machine learning models for accurate prioritization of variants of uncertain significance.
Mahecha D; Nuñez H; Lattig MC; Duitama J
Hum Mutat; 2022 Apr; 43(4):449-460. PubMed ID: 35143088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A machine learning approach based on ACMG/AMP guidelines for genomic variant classification and prioritization.
Nicora G; Zucca S; Limongelli I; Bellazzi R; Magni P
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2517. PubMed ID: 35169226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. tarSVM: Improving the accuracy of variant calls derived from microfluidic PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing using a support vector machine.
Gillies CE; Otto EA; Vega-Warner V; Robertson CC; Sanna-Cherchi S; Gharavi A; Crawford B; Bhimma R; Winkler C; ; ; Kang HM; Sampson MG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):233. PubMed ID: 27287006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning-based reclassification of germline variants of unknown significance: The RENOVO algorithm.
Favalli V; Tini G; Bonetti E; Vozza G; Guida A; Gandini S; Pelicci PG; Mazzarella L
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Apr; 108(4):682-695. PubMed ID: 33761318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diabetes mellitus prediction and diagnosis from a data preprocessing and machine learning perspective.
Olisah CC; Smith L; Smith M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 220():106773. PubMed ID: 35429810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A machine learning-based treatment prediction model using whole genome variants of hepatitis C virus.
Haga H; Sato H; Koseki A; Saito T; Okumoto K; Hoshikawa K; Katsumi T; Mizuno K; Nishina T; Ueno Y
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242028. PubMed ID: 33152046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MISTIC: A prediction tool to reveal disease-relevant deleterious missense variants.
Chennen K; Weber T; Lornage X; Kress A; Böhm J; Thompson J; Laporte J; Poch O
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236962. PubMed ID: 32735577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of machine learning to classify high-risk variants of uncertain significance in lamin A/C cardiac disease.
Bennett JS; Gordon DM; Majumdar U; Lawrence PJ; Matos-Nieves A; Myers K; Kamp AN; Leonard JC; McBride KL; White P; Garg V
Heart Rhythm; 2022 Apr; 19(4):676-685. PubMed ID: 34958940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personal Health Information Inference Using Machine Learning on RNA Expression Data from Patients With Cancer: Algorithm Validation Study.
Kweon S; Lee JH; Lee Y; Park YR
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18387. PubMed ID: 32773372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene-specific machine learning model to predict the pathogenicity of
Khandakji MN; Mifsud B
Front Genet; 2022; 13():982930. PubMed ID: 36246618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study.
Chen G; Lu M; Shi Z; Xia S; Ren Y; Liu Z; Liu X; Li Z; Mao L; Li XL; Zhang B; Zhang LJ; Lu GM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5170-5182. PubMed ID: 32350658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Software Defect Prediction for Healthcare Big Data: An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques.
Khan B; Naseem R; Shah MA; Wakil K; Khan A; Uddin MI; Mahmoud M
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():8899263. PubMed ID: 33815733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.
Kim J; Yoon Y; Park HJ; Kim YH
Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compare the performance of multiple binary classification models in microbial high-throughput sequencing datasets.
Xu N; Zhang Z; Shen Y; Zhang Q; Liu Z; Yu Y; Wang Y; Lei C; Ke M; Qiu D; Lu T; Chen Y; Xiong J; Qian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155807. PubMed ID: 35537509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.
Shirwaikar RD; Acharya U D; Makkithaya K; M S; Srivastava S; Lewis U LES
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 31521253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.
Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Peñagaricano F; Morota G; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8107-8121. PubMed ID: 33865589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ClinPred: Prediction Tool to Identify Disease-Relevant Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Variants.
Alirezaie N; Kernohan KD; Hartley T; Majewski J; Hocking TD
Am J Hum Genet; 2018 Oct; 103(4):474-483. PubMed ID: 30220433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
