These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35143240)

  • 1. On the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Conditions that promote staged versus cascaded processing.
    Besner D; Young T
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Jun; 76(2):122-131. PubMed ID: 35143240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can response congruency effects be obtained in masked priming lexical decision?
    Fernández-López M; Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1683-1702. PubMed ID: 30359052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategic control of processing in word recognition.
    Stone GO; Van Orden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):744-74. PubMed ID: 8409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading aloud: new evidence for contextual control over the breadth of lexical activation.
    Reynolds M; Besner D; Coltheart M
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1332-47. PubMed ID: 21830161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reading Aloud: Discrete Stage(s) Redux.
    Robidoux S; Besner D
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():218. PubMed ID: 28289395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition.
    Brown M; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Sep; 60(3):190-9. PubMed ID: 17076434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do visible semantic primes preactivate lexical representations?
    Taikh A; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1533-1569. PubMed ID: 32134318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.