These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35143259)

  • 1. Comparison of ten predictive equations for estimating lean body mass with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in older patients.
    Puri T; Blake GM
    Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20210378. PubMed ID: 35143259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Standardized CT-Based Method to Determine Lean Body Mass SUV for PET-A Significant Improvement Over Prediction Equations.
    Riauka TA; Baracos VE; Reif R; Juengling FD; Robinson DM; Wieler M; McEwan AJB
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():812777. PubMed ID: 35875083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of fat mass and appendicular lean mass in patients with obesity.
    Ballesteros-Pomar MD; González-Arnáiz E; Pintor-de-la Maza B; Barajas-Galindo D; Ariadel-Cobo D; González-Roza L; Cano-Rodríguez I
    Nutrition; 2022 Jan; 93():111442. PubMed ID: 34482097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies.
    Erselcan T; Turgut B; Dogan D; Ozdemir S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1630-8. PubMed ID: 12458398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women.
    Anderson LJ; Erceg DN; Schroeder ET
    Nutr Res; 2012 Jul; 32(7):479-85. PubMed ID: 22901555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of lean body weight in older community-dwelling men.
    Mitchell SJ; Kirkpatrick CM; Le Couteur DG; Naganathan V; Sambrook PN; Seibel MJ; Blyth FM; Waite LM; Handelsman DJ; Cumming RG; Hilmer SN
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 69(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 20233174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for estimation of lean body mass and appendicular lean soft tissue in Indian men and women.
    Kulkarni B; Kuper H; Taylor A; Wells JC; Radhakrishna KV; Kinra S; Ben-Shlomo Y; Smith GD; Ebrahim S; Byrne NM; Hills AP
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2013 Oct; 115(8):1156-62. PubMed ID: 23950165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement between laboratory methods and the 4-compartment model in assessing fat mass in obese older Hispanic-American adults.
    González-Arellanes R; Urquidez-Romero R; Rodríguez-Tadeo A; Esparza-Romero J; Méndez-Estrada RO; Ramírez-López E; Robles-Sardin AE; Pacheco-Moreno BI; Alemán-Mateo H
    Clin Nutr; 2021 May; 40(5):3592-3600. PubMed ID: 33419614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum lean body formulation for correction of standardized uptake value in PET imaging.
    Tahari AK; Chien D; Azadi JR; Wahl RL
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1481-4. PubMed ID: 24963129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction.
    Zhao J; Xue Q; Chen X; You Z; Wang Z; Yuan J; Liu H; Hu L
    EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):17. PubMed ID: 33598849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of surrogate methods to estimate skeletal muscle mass in non-dialysis dependent patients with chronic kidney disease and in kidney transplant recipients.
    Barreto Silva MI; Menna Barreto APM; Pontes KSDS; Costa MSD; Rosina KTC; Souza E; Bregman R; Prado CM; Klein MRST
    Clin Nutr; 2021 Jan; 40(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 32536581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimate of body composition by Hume's equation: validation with DXA.
    Carnevale V; Piscitelli PA; Minonne R; Castriotta V; Cipriani C; Guglielmi G; Scillitani A; Romagnoli E
    Endocrine; 2015 May; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 25209892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of New Formulas for Lean Body Mass on Lean-Body-Mass-Normalized SUV in Oncologic
    Halsne T; Müller EG; Spiten AE; Sherwani AG; Gyland Mikalsen LT; Revheim ME; Stokke C
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 29599401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for lean body mass, fat mass and percent fat in adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006.
    Lee DH; Keum N; Hu FB; Orav EJ; Rimm EB; Sun Q; Willett WC; Giovannucci EL
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Nov; 118(10):858-866. PubMed ID: 29110742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference Values of Total Lean Mass, Appendicular Lean Mass, and Fat Mass Measured with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in a Healthy Mexican Population.
    Clark P; Denova-Gutiérrez E; Ambrosi R; Szulc P; Rivas-Ruiz R; Salmerón J
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Nov; 99(5):462-471. PubMed ID: 27484026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Existing equations to estimate lean body mass are not accurate in the critically ill: Results of a multicenter observational study.
    Moisey LL; Mourtzakis M; Kozar RA; Compher C; Heyland DK
    Clin Nutr; 2017 Dec; 36(6):1701-1706. PubMed ID: 27697303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appendicular skeletal muscle in hospitalised hip-fracture patients: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Villani AM; Crotty M; Cameron ID; Kurrle SE; Skuza PP; Cleland LG; Cobiac L; Miller MD
    Age Ageing; 2014 Nov; 43(6):857-62. PubMed ID: 25049262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting Weight-Normalized SUV and Lean-Body-Mass-Normalized SUV in PET Studies.
    Sarikaya I; Albatineh AN; Sarikaya A
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Jun; 48(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31604893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fat-free mass prediction equations for bioelectric impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese adolescents: a validation study.
    Hofsteenge GH; Chinapaw MJ; Weijs PJ
    BMC Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 15():158. PubMed ID: 26471899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Lean Body Weight Equation by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measures.
    Beckman LM; Boullata JI; Fisher PL; Compher CW; Earthman CP
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2017 Mar; 41(3):392-397. PubMed ID: 26220198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.