These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35143392)

  • 1. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
    Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
    Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
    Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
    Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback.
    Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 36331796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.
    Mussoi BS; Meibos A; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Jan; 25(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 38081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes in Cochlear Implants with Electric Field Imaging/Transimpedance Measurements: A Human Cadaver Study.
    de Rijk SR; Tam YC; Carlyon RP; Bance ML
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1196-1207. PubMed ID: 31923041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
    Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of Perimodiolar Electrode Position for Psychoacoustic Discrimination in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos Macias A; Perez Zaballos MT; Ramos de Miguel A; Cervera Paz J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e429-e437. PubMed ID: 29135866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion Depth.
    Aebischer P; Meyer S; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):545-555. PubMed ID: 32746052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impedance Measures During in vitro Cochlear Implantation Predict Array Positioning.
    Giardina CK; Krause ES; Koka K; Fitzpatrick DC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 65(2):327-335. PubMed ID: 29346102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.
    Sunwoo W; Jeon HW; Choi BY
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22809. PubMed ID: 34815432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements.
    Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Siebrecht M; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 33974777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.
    Bester C; Dalbert A; Collins A; Razmovski T; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):710-720. PubMed ID: 36550618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modifying cochlear implant design: advantages of placing a return electrode in the modiolus.
    Ho SY; Wiet RJ; Richter CP
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Jul; 25(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 15241228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation.
    Saoji AA; Adkins WJ; Olund AP; Graham M; Patel NS; Neff BA; Carlson ML; Driscoll CLW
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Nov; 59(11):881-888. PubMed ID: 32749178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Electrode to Modiolus Distance on Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Parameters in CI Patients With Perimodiolar and Lateral Electrode Arrays.
    Degen CV; Büchner A; Kludt E; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e1091-e1097. PubMed ID: 32925843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.