These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514446)

  • 1. An evaluation of self-recorded blood pressure during drug trials.
    Gould BA; Hornung RS; Kieso H; Cashman PM; Raftery EB
    Hypertension; 1986 Apr; 8(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 3514446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verapamil and prazosin in essential hypertension: evidence of a synergistic combination?
    Elliott HL; Meredith PA; Reid JL
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1987; 10 Suppl 10():S108-10. PubMed ID: 2455106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does placebo lower blood-pressure?
    Gould BA; Mann S; Davies AB; Altman DG; Raftery EB
    Lancet; 1981 Dec 19-26; 2(8260-61):1377-81. PubMed ID: 6118757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].
    Amado P; Vasconcelos N; Santos I; Almeida L; Nazaré J; Carmona J
    Rev Port Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 18(10):897-906. PubMed ID: 10590654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the accuracy and role of self-recorded blood pressures in the management of hypertension.
    Gould BA; Kieso HA; Hornung R; Altman DG; Cashman PM; Raftery EB
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Dec; 285(6356):1691-4. PubMed ID: 6816333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial antihypertensive therapy. Comparison of prazosin and hydrochlorothiazide.
    Alderman MH; Davis TK; Carroll L
    Am J Med; 1986 Feb; 80(2A):120-5. PubMed ID: 3511691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulse pressure changes with six classes of antihypertensive agents in a randomized, controlled trial.
    Cushman WC; Materson BJ; Williams DW; Reda DJ
    Hypertension; 2001 Oct; 38(4):953-7. PubMed ID: 11641316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-recording of blood pressure in the management of hypertension.
    Johnson AL; Taylor DW; Sackett DL; Dunnett CW; Shimizu AG
    Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Nov; 119(9):1034-9. PubMed ID: 369673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous recording of direct arterial pressure in unrestricted patients. Its role in the diagnosis and management of high blood pressure.
    Littler WA; Honour AJ; Pugsley DJ; Sleight P
    Circulation; 1975 Jun; 51(6):1101-6. PubMed ID: 1132100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossover design to test antihypertensive drugs with self-recorded blood pressure.
    Ménard J; Serrurier D; Bautier P; Plouin PF; Corvol P
    Hypertension; 1988 Feb; 11(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 3277912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artefacts in measurement of blood pressure and lack of target organ involvement in the assessment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
    Mejia AD; Egan BM; Schork NJ; Zweifler AJ
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Feb; 112(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 2297205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender and age effects on the ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate responses to antihypertensive therapy.
    White WB; Johnson MF; Black HR; Elliott WJ; Sica DA
    Am J Hypertens; 2001 Dec; 14(12):1239-47. PubMed ID: 11775133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Felodipine versus prazosin as an addition to a beta-blocker in the treatment of essential hypertension. The Australian Multicentre Study.
    Jackson B; Morgan TO; Gibson J; Anderson A
    Drugs; 1987; 34 Suppl 3():109-19. PubMed ID: 2894971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of self-measured blood pressure in a study with a calcium-channel antagonist versus a beta-blocker.
    Mengden T; Binswanger B; Weisser B; Vetter W
    Am J Hypertens; 1992 Mar; 5(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 1349485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Casual versus 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recording in the evaluation of chronic administration of sustained-release verapamil.
    Cardillo C; Savi L; Musumeci V; Mores N; Mettimano M; Costalunga A; Guerrera G; Melina D; Folli G
    J Hum Hypertens; 1988 Mar; 1(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 3221375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.
    Pepine CJ; Handberg EM; Cooper-DeHoff RM; Marks RG; Kowey P; Messerli FH; Mancia G; Cangiano JL; Garcia-Barreto D; Keltai M; Erdine S; Bristol HA; Kolb HR; Bakris GL; Cohen JD; Parmley WW;
    JAMA; 2003 Dec; 290(21):2805-16. PubMed ID: 14657064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of indirect methods used to determine blood pressure. Office vs mean 24-hour automated blood pressures.
    Bottini PB; Carr AA; Rhoades RB; Prisant LM
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 1728909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of Blood Pressure Measurement Technique for Implementation of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).
    Agarwal R
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Feb; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 28159816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Jula A; Puukka P; Karanko H
    Hypertension; 1999 Aug; 34(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 10454451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the value of home (self) blood pressure monitoring in patients with hypertensive heart disease?
    Mengden T; Schwartzkopff B; Strauer BE
    Am J Hypertens; 1998 Jul; 11(7):813-9. PubMed ID: 9683042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.