85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35144614)
21. Estimating Cognitive Workload in an Interactive Virtual Reality Environment Using EEG.
Tremmel C; Herff C; Sato T; Rechowicz K; Yamani Y; Krusienski DJ
Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():401. PubMed ID: 31803035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploring Horizontally Flipped Interaction in Virtual Reality for Improving Spatial Ability.
Bozgeyikli LL; Bozgeyikli E; Schnell C; Clark J
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Nov; 29(11):4514-4524. PubMed ID: 37831578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical trainee performance on task-based AR/VR-guided surgical simulation is correlated with their 3D image spatial reasoning scores.
Eagleson R; Kikinov D; Bilbie L; de Ribaupierre S
Healthc Technol Lett; 2024; 11(2-3):117-125. PubMed ID: 38638489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cognitive Load Measurement in a Virtual Reality-based Driving System for Autism Intervention.
Zhang L; Wade J; Bian D; Fan J; Swanson A; Weitlauf A; Warren Z; Sarkar N
IEEE Trans Affect Comput; 2017; 8(2):176-189. PubMed ID: 28966730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual modalities-based multimodal fusion for surgical phase recognition.
Park B; Chi H; Park B; Lee J; Jin HS; Park S; Hyung WJ; Choi MK
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107453. PubMed ID: 37774560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Approaches to Laparoscopic Training in Veterinary Medicine: A Review of Personalized Simulators.
Dejescu CA; Bel LV; Melega I; Muresan SMC; Oana LI
Animals (Basel); 2023 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 38136818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Method for Assessing the Influence of Phobic Stimuli in Virtual Simulators.
Obukhov A; Krasnyanskiy M; Volkov A; Nazarova A; Teselkin D; Patutin K; Zajceva D
J Imaging; 2023 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 37888302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Virtual reality and augmented reality- emerging screening and diagnostic techniques in ophthalmology: A systematic review.
Ma MKI; Saha C; Poon SHL; Yiu RSW; Shih KC; Chan YK
Surv Ophthalmol; 2022; 67(5):1516-1530. PubMed ID: 35181279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated algorithm aided capacity and confidence boost in surgical decision-making training for inferior clivus.
Tang K; Bu B; Tian H; Li Y; Jiang X; Qian Z; Zhou Y
Front Surg; 2024; 11():1375861. PubMed ID: 38699561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structured feedback and operative video debriefing with critical view of safety annotation in training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.
Cizmic A; Häberle F; Wise PA; Müller F; Gabel F; Mascagni P; Namazi B; Wagner M; Hashimoto DA; Madani A; Alseidi A; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3241-3252. PubMed ID: 38653899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical Sabermetrics: A Scoping Review of Technology-enhanced Assessment of Nontechnical Skills in the Operating Room.
Howie EE; Ambler O; Gunn EGM; Dias RD; Wigmore SJ; Skipworth RJE; Yule SJ
Ann Surg; 2024 Jun; 279(6):973-984. PubMed ID: 38258573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multimodal Approach to Assess a Virtual Reality-based Surgical Training Platform.
Demirel D; Keles HO; Modak C; Basturk KK; Barker JR; Halic T
Virtual Augment Mixed Real (2023); 2023 Jul; 14027():430-440. PubMed ID: 37961730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Metaverse Wearables for Immersive Digital Healthcare: A Review.
Kim K; Yang H; Lee J; Lee WG
Adv Sci (Weinh); 2023 Nov; 10(31):e2303234. PubMed ID: 37740417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adding Safety Rules to Surgeon-Authored Virtual Reality Training.
Gao R; Kurenov S; Black EW; Peters J
Simul Healthc; 2023 Dec; 18(6):400-407. PubMed ID: 37342919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative influence and performance analysis of virtual reality laparoscopic surgical training system.
Yu P; Pan J; Wang Z; Shen Y; Li J; Hao A; Wang H
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Feb; 22(1):92. PubMed ID: 35144614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.
Mori T; Ikeda K; Takeshita N; Teramura K; Ito M
BMC Surg; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 34998376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.
Frederiksen JG; Sørensen SMD; Konge L; Svendsen MBS; Nobel-Jørgensen M; Bjerrum F; Andersen SAW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 31172325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things?
Kojima Y; Wong HJ; Kuchta K; Linn JG; Haggerty SP; Denham W; Ujiki MB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6661-6671. PubMed ID: 35106638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.
Bric JD; Lumbard DC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2169-78. PubMed ID: 26304107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
