These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35146366)

  • 1. Evaluation of three different methods for susceptibility testing of gentamicin in carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales.
    Cayci YT; Ulker KH; Birinci A
    Infez Med; 2021; 29(4):568-573. PubMed ID: 35146366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii by automated systems (BD Phoenix, Microscan WalkAway, Vitek 2); high error rates with Microscan WalkAway.
    Kulah C; Aktas E; Comert F; Ozlu N; Akyar I; Ankarali H
    BMC Infect Dis; 2009 Mar; 9():30. PubMed ID: 19291298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant
    Zhao Z; Lan F; Liu M; Chen W; Huang L; Lin Q; Li B
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2017; 6():77. PubMed ID: 28785404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance Evaluation of BD Phoenix NMIC-413 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Panel for Imipenem, Meropenem, and Ertapenem Against Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant and Carbapenem-Susceptible
    Zhang J; Jia P; Zhu Y; Zhang G; Xu Y; Yang Q
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():643194. PubMed ID: 33937287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Sharma B; Sreenivasan P; Angrup A; Kaur S; Rana S; Kundu J; Biswal M; Ray P
    Curr Drug Saf; 2023; 18(4):563-570. PubMed ID: 36503394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Seven Tigecycline Susceptibility Testing Methods for Carbapenem-Resistant
    Li H; Zhou M; Chen X; Zhang Y; Jian Z; Yan Q; Liu WE
    Infect Drug Resist; 2021; 14():1511-1516. PubMed ID: 33907429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modifying enzymes related aminoglycoside: analyses of resistant Acinetobacter isolates.
    Atasoy AR; Ciftci IH; Petek M
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(2):2874-80. PubMed ID: 25932248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
    Staneck JL; Glenn S; DiPersio JR; Leist PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 2511223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion compared to reference broth microdilution for testing tigecycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in a multicenter study in China.
    Yin D; Guo Y; Li M; Wu W; Tang J; Liu Y; Chen F; Ni Y; Sun J; Zhang H; Zhao H; Hu F
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Jun; 40(6):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 33411173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of disk diffusion and broth microdilution for fosfomycin susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Mojica MF; De La Cadena E; Hernández-Gómez C; Correa A; Appel TM; Pallares CJ; Villegas MV
    J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2020 Jun; 21():391-395. PubMed ID: 32004722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of microscan walkaway 96 plus ID/AST system and mikrolatest broth microdilution kit in assessing
    Singh RI; Bhatia M; Anusha KR; Singh V; Omar BJ; Gupta P
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2019; 37(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 32436871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of 500 gram negative isolates to determine the number of major susceptibility interpretation discrepancies between the Vitek and MicroScan Walkaway for 9 antimicrobial agents.
    Rittenhouse SF; Miller LA; Utrup LJ; Poupard JA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Sep; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8950521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae not detected by automated susceptibility testing.
    Tenover FC; Kalsi RK; Williams PP; Carey RB; Stocker S; Lonsway D; Rasheed JK; Biddle JW; McGowan JE; Hanna B
    Emerg Infect Dis; 2006 Aug; 12(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16965699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated system for determining antimicrobial susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae compared with broth microdilution.
    Haffler ZJ; Kulengowski B; Ribes JA; Burgess DS
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2019 Aug; 54(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31071467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents.
    Sader HS; Fritsche TR; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):1101-4. PubMed ID: 16517904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of six antimicrobial susceptibility methods for testing linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci.
    Tenover FC; Williams PP; Stocker S; Thompson A; Clark LA; Limbago B; Carey RB; Poppe SM; Shinabarger D; McGowan JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):2917-22. PubMed ID: 17634301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
    Steward CD; Mohammed JM; Swenson JM; Stocker SA; Williams PP; Gaynes RP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):351-8. PubMed ID: 12517872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of isepamicin in vitro efficiency in Gram negative bacteria efficacy of isepamicin.
    Yeliz TC; Ali HB; Sarah AF; Sreylis N; Kubra HU; Asuman B
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 33610258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single neonatal intensive care unit, 1989-2000.
    Klingenberg C; Sundsfjord A; Rønnestad A; Mikalsen J; Gaustad P; Flaegstad T
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Nov; 54(5):889-96. PubMed ID: 15471996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.